Implanted Medical Device Proximity Test Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Implantable medical devices (IMDs) and external devices (EXDs) often experience communication failures due to being out of range or electromagnetic interference, leading to ineffective data transmission and alerting systems for patients with cardiac or neural disorders.

Innovation Solution

The system includes an IMD with a transceiver, random access memory, and a processor that wirelessly transmits proximity test signals to determine if the EXD is within range, maintaining a proximity test log and sending notification signals if failures occur, allowing patients to take remedial action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the external device is placed far from the implanted device to improve patient convenience, then ease of operation is improved, but communication reliability deteriorates due to out-of-range errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient convenienceVSAvoidcommunication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs proximity tests before actual data transmission to verify communication capability. The processor sends test signals and evaluates responses to determine whether the external device is within acceptable range, preventing failed transmissions from occurring in the first place

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors communication status through proximity tests and provides feedback to both devices. When the external device is detected as being out of range or experiencing communication issues, the system generates notifications and alerts to inform the patient and healthcare provider of the communication status

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If proximity tests are performed frequently to improve communication reliability, then reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs proximity tests at scheduled intervals rather than continuously. The processor is programmed to conduct tests at predetermined times, balancing the need for communication reliability verification with energy conservation by keeping the transceiver in low-power states between tests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically performs proximity tests and evaluates communication status without requiring patient intervention. The processor autonomously sends test signals, receives responses, and determines communication capability, reducing the need for manual testing while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system monitors communication status continuously to improve reliability, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The proximity test mechanism serves multiple functions: it verifies communication range, detects external device presence, assesses signal strength, and provides a basis for generating notifications. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate monitoring systems and simplifies the overall architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances communication reliability between IMDs and EXDs, reducing out-of-range errors and ensuring timely alerts for patients, thereby improving patient safety and medical intervention.

Implementation Method 1

The processor is configured to wirelessly transmit a plurality of proximity test signals as part of a proximity test

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9486153B2Medical device system having an implanted medical device and an external device
Publication Date: 2016.11.08 AVERTIX MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US9486153B2 patent drawing
  • US9486153B2 patent drawing
  • US9486153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system having an implanted component and external component which are configured to provide a test of wireless communication in order to assess the success or failure of such communication and to store attributes related to such test in a memory log. To provide the communication test the implantable and external components can attempt wireless communication according to communication test parameters which relate to number of times to retry communication, duration of sending communication test signals, durations of waiting for communication test signals and the schedule of the communication tests. The schedule of tests may be period or may change over time in order to become more or less frequency according to a programmable schedule that may also decrease if the communication tests are successful and indicate patient compliance in keeping the external components close by. The communication tests can assist in determining if the patient is maintaining external components within a suggested proximity (e.g. 6 feet) of the patient and may assist to determine if transmission or reception difficulties are the source of communication failure. A physician programmer can provide for programming, conducting, summarizing and assessing the results of communication tests.