Agricultural Implement Leveling via Independent Actuator Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current farm implements with large lateral spans face challenges in maintaining uniform and level tool contact with the soil due to hydraulic actuator synchronization issues and field conditions, requiring manual adjustments that decrease efficiency and speed.

Innovation Solution

A system with interconnected carrier frames and actuators, equipped with sensors and an electronic control unit, allows for independent adjustment and synchronization of each actuator to maintain a uniform position of soil-engaging tools relative to the soil, using displacement and rate of change signals to correct deviations in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If hydraulic actuators are connected in series to control depth of penetration, then the implement can operate with large lateral spans, but hydraulic fluid leakage causes actuators to become out of sync

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral spanVSAvoidactuator synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the implement into multiple independently controllable sections, each with its own actuator and control unit. This segmentation allows each section to be controlled individually, preventing synchronization issues that would affect the entire implement if one actuator fails or leaks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors are installed on each actuator to provide real-time feedback on actuator position and status to the electronic control unit. This feedback mechanism enables the system to detect and correct synchronization deviations automatically, maintaining reliable operation even when actuators are subject to leakage or field conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual adjustments are made to synchronize actuator sections, then level positioning can be achieved, but operator dismounting and manual adjustment decrease efficiency and speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevel positioningVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment through automatic control. The electronic control unit continuously monitors sensor data and automatically adjusts actuator positions to maintain level positioning, eliminating the need for operator intervention and manual adjustments during field operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical adjustment process is replaced with an automated electronic control system. The ECU uses sensor feedback to electronically control actuator movements, substituting the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated electromechanical system that maintains positioning accuracy without requiring operator dismounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If implement is fully elevated to synchronize actuators through bypass flow, then actuator synchronization is restored, but additional operational steps decrease efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator synchronizationVSAvoidsynchronization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time sensor feedback allows the system to detect synchronization issues and correct them immediately during normal operation, eliminating the need to stop work and fully elevate the implement for synchronization. The continuous monitoring and adjustment process maintains synchronization without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary synchronization adjustments continuously during operation rather than waiting for synchronization to fail. The electronic control unit proactively makes small corrections based on sensor feedback, preventing the need for major corrective actions like full elevation later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9839173B2Method of leveling an agricultural implement
Publication Date: 2017.12.12 CNH IND CANADA
  • US9839173B2 patent drawing
  • US9839173B2 patent drawing
  • US9839173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An agricultural implement having agricultural implement for supporting a plurality of gangs of disk blades extending generally laterally relative to a for travel direction. The implement has carrier frames pivotally connected to wheel assemblies for controlling the height of the carrier frames relative to the ground through hydraulic actuators acting on the wheel assemblies. A hydraulic control unit enables independent and individual control of each actuator through the use of three way valves that selectively connect or lock individual actuators.