Work Vehicle Implement Position Control via Sliding Mode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional work vehicles face challenges in maintaining a constant angular position of implements, such as buckets, during lifting and lowering operations due to poor system responsiveness and imprecise control, particularly due to the non-linearity of lift assembly dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop control system that uses a combination of feed-forward, feedback, and forcing control algorithms, incorporating a sliding mode control design, to adjust the position of the implement based on signals from position, movement, and fluid pressure sensors, ensuring the implement maintains a fixed orientation relative to a reference point.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If conventional control algorithms are used to automatically maintain constant angular implement position, then automation is improved, but system responsiveness and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic implement position controlVSAvoidimplement position control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors the actual implement position and angular orientation using sensors, compares these measurements against the desired position, and automatically adjusts the loader arm movement to eliminate any deviation. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures precise maintainance of constant angular implement position throughout the lifting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If conventional control algorithms are used to automatically maintain constant angular implement position, then automation is improved, but system responsiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic implement position controlVSAvoidsystem responsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system predicts the required implement position adjustments based on the current loader arm movement state and pre-calculates the necessary corrections before deviations occur. This anticipatory control approach allows the system to respond proactively to changing conditions, maintaining responsiveness while achieving precise constant angular position control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If manual adjustment of implement position is used during loader arm movement, then system complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidoperator control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system autonomously manages implement position control without requiring continuous manual intervention. The operator simply commands loader arm movement, and the system automatically adjusts the implement position to maintain constant angular orientation throughout the lifting operation, significantly reducing operational complexity and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9822507B2Work vehicle with enhanced implement position control and bi-directional self-leveling functionality
Publication Date: 2017.11.21 BLUE LEAF I P INC
  • US9822507B2 patent drawing
  • US9822507B2 patent drawing
  • US9822507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for automatically adjusting the position of an implement of a lift assembly may generally include receiving a signal indicative of a position and/or a movement parameter of loader arms of the lift assembly and receiving a signal indicative of a pressure of a hydraulic fluid supplied within the lift assembly. The method may also include calculating a first correction signal associated with adjusting the position of the implement, wherein the correction signal is calculated by inputting the position and/or the movement parameter and the fluid pressure into a control equation based on a model of the operational dynamics of the lift assembly. In addition, the method may include generating a valve command signal based at least in part on the correction signal and transmitting the valve command signal to a valve for maintaining the implement at a fixed orientation relative as the loader arms are being moved.