Implement Velocity Control for Cross-Track Steering Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern mobile machinery, such as agricultural and earthmoving machines, face challenges in accurately controlling velocity to maintain precise horizontal steering and minimize cross track errors due to system limitations, environmental factors, and uneven terrain, which affects efficiency and soil compaction.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that captures sensor data to estimate the actual position of the machine, calculates cross track errors, and adjusts velocity to reduce these errors by comparing actual and target cross track error metrics, using a velocity control loop in conjunction with a steering control loop to achieve optimal horizontal control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If velocity control is not implemented, then the machine can operate at higher speeds, but cross track error increases and horizontal steering precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehorizontal steering precisionVSAvoidmachine velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors actual position using sensors (GNSS, IMU, wheel encoders) and compares it to the desired guidance path, then adjusts velocity based on the calculated cross track error. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise horizontal steering control while maintaining efficient operating speeds by dynamically adjusting velocity rather than maintaining a constant low speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If velocity control is implemented to reduce cross track error, then horizontal control improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow/furrow alignmentVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The velocity control module integrates multiple functions into a single system: it processes data from various sensors (GNSS, IMU, wheel encoders), calculates cross track error, determines optimal velocity adjustments, and outputs control signals. This multi-functional integration improves row/furrow alignment while minimizing the increase in overall system complexity by consolidating control functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The velocity control module acts as an intermediary between the guidance path definition and the actual machine execution. It receives the desired path, calculates deviations, and generates velocity commands that mediate between the steering control and the prime mover, simplifying the overall control architecture while achieving precise alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If cross track error is not minimized, then machine can operate more efficiently, but soil compaction increases and area coverage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsoil compaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts velocity based on real-time cross track error conditions rather than operating at a fixed speed. When the machine is close to the desired path, velocity can be maintained or increased for efficiency; when deviation occurs, velocity is reduced to allow correction. This dynamic velocity control minimizes soil compaction and optimizes area coverage while maintaining high operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12048270B2Velocity control for improving cross track error of implement-equipped machines
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 PTX TRIMBLE LLC
  • US12048270B2 patent drawing
  • US12048270B2 patent drawing
  • US12048270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems, methods, and other techniques for controlling a velocity of an implement-equipped machine. An actual position of the implement-equipped machine is estimated based on sensor data captured using the machine's sensors. A cross track error between a target position and the actual position is calculated. An actual cross track error metric is calculated based on the cross track error. The actual cross track error metric is compared to a target cross track error metric to determine a velocity adjustment, where the velocity adjustment is determined so as to reduce a difference between the actual cross track error metric and the target cross track error metric. The velocity of the implement-equipped machine is adjusted by the velocity adjustment.