Implement Vibration Detection for Accurate Ground Contact Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing construction machines face challenges in accurately determining the period during which an implement interacts with the ground surface, leading to inaccuracies in ground surface mapping, which can result in errors in project execution and material tracking.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a vibration sensor to capture signals indicative of implement movement, combined with machine-learning models to predict implement-on-ground (IOG) start and end times, enabling precise determination of the interaction period.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional sensors and methods are used to determine implement-on-ground interaction, then the system structure remains simple, but measurement precision and reliability of IOG detection deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIOG detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration signal processing is segmented into multiple stages: raw signal acquisition from accelerometer, feature extraction (time-domain and frequency-domain analysis), machine learning model processing, and final IOG state determination. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning model serves as an intermediary between the raw vibration signals and the IOG state determination. The model processes complex vibration patterns and translates them into reliable IOG predictions, acting as a mediator that bridges sensor data and control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If vibration signals and machine-learning models are used to accurately detect IOG periods, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground surface mapping accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model is pre-trained offline with labeled vibration data to learn the relationship between vibration patterns and IOG states. This preliminary action transfers computational burden from real-time operation to offline training, reducing on-board computational requirements while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical or threshold-based IOG detection methods are replaced with a data-driven machine learning approach. The system substitutes physical modeling with statistical learning, allowing the model to capture complex nonlinear relationships between vibration signals and ground interaction states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If precise IOG detection is implemented through advanced signal processing, then manufacturing precision of ground surface maps improves, but loss of time for processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground surface map accuracyVSAvoidsignal processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes vibration signals at discrete time intervals rather than continuously analyzing every data point. This periodic processing approach maintains ground surface map accuracy while reducing computational load and processing time compared to continuous analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from vibration signals (such as dominant frequency components and time-domain statistics) rather than processing the complete signal spectrum. This partial action approach achieves sufficient precision for ground surface mapping while minimizing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate real-time adjustment of ground surface maps and enhances material tracking by providing precise knowledge of when and where the implement contacts the ground, improving construction efficiency and accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

capturing a vibration signal that is indicative of a movement of the implement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20250277808A1Implement-on-ground detection using vibration signals
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 CATERPILLAR TRIMBLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20250277808A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277808A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277808A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems, methods, and other techniques for determining a period during which an implement of a construction machine is interacting with a ground surface. A vibration signal that is indicative of a movement of the implement is captured. One or more features are extracted from the vibration signal. The one or more features are provided to a machine-learning model to generate a model output. An implement-on-ground (IOG) start time and an IOG end time are predicted based on the model output, the IOG start time and the IOG end time forming the period.