Cross-Platform Mutual Exclusion Using Implementation-Agnostic Contexts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developing multi-threaded applications that run on diverse platforms is resource-intensive and prone to concurrency issues due to platform-specific differences in mutual exclusion implementation, leading to inefficiencies and potential data corruption.

Innovation Solution

A cross-platform framework generates platform-specific code from platform-agnostic source code, using an implementation-agnostic context to ensure isolated execution of code blocks, employing locks, scheduling, or runtime determination based on platform-specific benefits and performance data to enforce mutual exclusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If platform-agnostic source code is used to enable cross-platform deployment, then adaptability across multiple operating systems is improved, but concurrency issues and data corruption risks worsen due to platform-specific mutual exclusion differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-platform compatibilityVSAvoidconcurrency safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a code generation system as an intermediary layer between platform-agnostic source code and platform-specific implementations. This intermediary analyzes the target platform's mutual exclusion mechanisms and automatically generates appropriate synchronization code, eliminating direct exposure to platform-specific differences while maintaining concurrency safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of platform-specific mutual exclusion implementations during the code generation phase. By pre-determining the appropriate synchronization strategy for each platform before deployment, the system avoids runtime concurrency issues and ensures reliability across different operating systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If platform-specific mutual exclusion implementations are used to ensure concurrency safety, then reliability is improved, but resource consumption worsens due to platform-specific optimizations and overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrency safetyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The code generation system dynamically adjusts synchronization parameters based on platform characteristics. By changing mutual exclusion implementation parameters (such as lock granularity, synchronization primitives, and contention handling strategies) to match each platform's optimal performance profile, the system achieves both reliability and resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual platform-specific code development is performed to optimize performance, then productivity is improved through platform optimizations, but device complexity worsens due to multiple codebases and maintenance overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidcodebase complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal code generation framework that serves multiple functions: analyzing platform characteristics, selecting appropriate mutual exclusion strategies, generating optimized platform-specific code, and maintaining a single source of truth through platform-agnostic source code. This eliminates the need for separate manual codebases while achieving platform-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If cross-platform framework abstraction is used to simplify development, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision worsens due to loss of platform-specific optimization control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment simplicityVSAvoidcode generation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The code generation system incorporates feedback mechanisms that analyze platform-specific mutual exclusion behaviors and performance characteristics. This feedback loop enables the system to automatically adjust generated code to achieve precise platform optimization while maintaining developer simplicity through the platform-agnostic source code interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4650941A1Cross-platform mutual exclusion
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP4650941A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4650941A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4650941A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Systems, methods, apparatuses, and computer program products are disclosed for generating, from platform-agnostic source code, platform-specific code to efficiently implement mutual exclusion. Platform-agnostic source code includes a first block of code associated with a first implementation-agnostic context that is structured to cause instances of the first block of code to execute in isolation from other instances of code associated with the first implementation-agnostic context. A mutual exclusion implementation is determined for efficient implementation of mutual exclusion on a target platform. Platform-specific code is generated for the target platform to execute instances of the first block of code in isolation from other instances of code associated with the first implementation-agnostic context based on the determined mutual exclusion implementation.