Implicit Input Processing for Software Functionality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software applications are unable to accurately and efficiently process implicit input, such as environmental noises, facial expressions, and user utterances, leading to increased computational resource demands and potential misinterpretation of user intent.

Innovation Solution

Employing machine learning models, particularly natural language processing (NLP) and multimodal large language models (LLMs), to determine the semantic meaning of implicit input and modify software application functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex sequences of explicit input are used to modify software functionality, then the software can achieve its goals, but computational resources (processor, memory, network capacity) are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware functionality achievementVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an implicit input processing system that acts as an intermediary between the user and the software application. This system captures implicit input (environmental noises, facial expressions, utterances) and automatically translates it into meaningful commands, eliminating the need for complex explicit input sequences and reducing computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical input methods (keyboard typing, mouse clicking) with automated sensing and processing systems. Sensors capture implicit input modalities such as audio, visual, and environmental data, which are then processed by machine learning models to generate software commands, substituting manual mechanical operations with automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If current software applications process implicit input using traditional methods, then they can handle basic inputs, but they are unable to interpret implicit input accurately and efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplicit input processing capabilityVSAvoiduser intent interpretation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms implicit input from raw sensor data into meaningful parameters by applying machine learning models. The system changes the parameter representation from unstructured environmental data to structured intent classifications, enabling accurate interpretation of user meaning while maintaining versatility in handling diverse input modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary processing of implicit input through trained machine learning models before the software application needs to act on it. The system pre-interprets environmental noises, facial expressions, and utterances to determine user intent in advance, making the subsequent software response more accurate and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are deployed on client devices to process implicit input, then user intent interpretation accuracy is enhanced, but device processing power and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intent interpretation accuracyVSAvoidclient device processing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the implicit input processing system into multiple components distributed across different devices. Machine learning models can be deployed on remote servers to handle complex interpretation tasks, while client devices perform lighter preprocessing and receive processed results, dividing the computational burden and reducing individual device complexity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250298974A1Modifying Software Functionality based on Implicit Input
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 GAMES GLOBAL OPERATIONS LTD
  • US20250298974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298974A1 patent drawing
  • US20250298974A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An implementation may involve: receiving audio input that contains utterances; determining, by a speech-to-text engine that receives the audio input, a textual representation of the utterances; providing, to a natural language model, a request to determine an intent of the textual representation of the utterances, wherein the request indicates that the intent is to be selected from a plurality of predefined intents; receiving, from the natural language model, the intent; determining, based on the intent, an action; and based on the action, modifying operation of a software application.