Implicit Manifold Density Estimation for High-Dimensional Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing density modeling approaches struggle to effectively model the manifold structure and probability density in high-dimensional spaces, as they often require direct parameterization of manifolds, leading to computational instability and inability to learn probability densities within the manifold.

Innovation Solution

The use of an energy-based implicit manifold (EBIM) model, where a manifold-defining function learns the manifold as a zero set and an energy function is trained to represent probability density, allowing for effective modeling of densities on the manifold using neural networks with trainable parameters, and employing contrastive divergence loss and constrained Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If direct parameterization of manifolds is used, then probability density can be learned within the manifold, but computational instability occurs and the manifold structure cannot be effectively modeled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational stabilityVSAvoidmanifold structure modeling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an implicit manifold representation as an intermediary between the high-dimensional data space and the probability density model. Instead of directly parameterizing the manifold, the method uses an implicit function whose zero-level set defines the manifold, allowing stable computation while preserving complex manifold structures. This intermediary representation enables both computational stability and effective manifold modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by defining the manifold as the zero-level set of an implicit function rather than explicitly parameterizing it. This inversion allows the manifold to be defined indirectly through the level set of a learned function, avoiding the computational instability of direct parameterization while maintaining the ability to represent complex geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If pushforward models are used to map from latent space to high-dimensional space, then probability density can be modeled, but the manifold cannot be effectively represented and single parameterization fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanifold topology representationVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the manifold representation problem from the data space to a latent function space. By defining the manifold as the zero-level set of an implicit function in a lower-dimensional latent space, the method can represent complex high-dimensional manifolds through a simpler latent representation, avoiding the need for direct high-dimensional parameterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If manifold is modeled in m-dimensional latent space with mapping to n-dimensional space, then probability density can be estimated, but computational instability occurs and learning within manifold becomes infeasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobability density estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical mapping system of pushforward models with an implicit function-based system. Instead of using a differentiable mapping to push forward samples from latent space to data space, the method uses an implicit function whose level sets define the manifold, enabling direct probability density estimation on the manifold without unstable transformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230385693A1Learned density estimation with implicit manifolds
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK
  • US20230385693A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385693A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385693A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Probability density modeling, such as for generative modeling, for data on a manifold of a high-dimensional space is performed with an implicitly-defined manifold such that points belonging to the manifold is the zero set of a manifold-defining function. An energy function is trained to learn an energy function that, evaluated on the manifold, describes a probability density for the manifold. As such, the relevant portions of the energy function are “filtered through” the defined manifold for training and in application. The combined energy function and manifold-defining function provide an “energy-based implicit manifold” that can more effectively model probability densities of a manifold in the high-dimensional space. As the manifold-defining function and the energy function are defined across the high-dimensional space, they may more effectively learn geometries and avoid distortions due to change in dimension that occur for models that model the manifold in a lower-dimensional space.