Implicit Prioritization for Secondary Index Rate-Limiting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Creating secondary indexes in database systems can be resource intensive and may lead to inconsistency between the main database table and the secondary index, especially when handling high volumes of request traffic, which can impact performance and user access guarantees.

Innovation Solution

Implementing implicit prioritization to rate-limit secondary index creation by limiting the capacity available for indexing operations, ensuring that user access requests receive guaranteed performance by throttling indexing operations when capacity limitations are exceeded.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If secondary index creation is performed without rate-limiting, then indexing completeness and data consistency are improved, but resource consumption increases and user access performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoiduser access performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the rate-limiting threshold for secondary index creation based on real-time resource availability and user access patterns. The threshold is not fixed but adapts to changing system conditions, allowing the system to maintain data consistency while preserving user access performance under varying loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of resource capacity before allowing secondary index creation operations. By checking whether sufficient resources are available in advance and rejecting operations that would exceed thresholds, the system prevents resource exhaustion and maintains user access performance while still enabling index creation when resources permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If secondary index creation is rate-limited to preserve user access performance, then user access performance is maintained, but indexing completeness and data consistency may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser access performanceVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The rate-limiting threshold is dynamically adjusted based on system state. When resources become available or less critical, the threshold increases, allowing more aggressive indexing. When resources are constrained, the threshold decreases to preserve user access performance. This dynamic adjustment ensures data consistency is maintained to the extent possible without sacrificing user performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the rate-limiting parameter (threshold) based on system conditions and priorities. By adjusting this parameter, the system can shift between prioritizing user access performance and prioritizing indexing completeness, allowing it to adapt to different operational contexts and maintain both goals under different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If capacity threshold for indexing operations is increased, then indexing speed and completeness are improved, but resource constraints and user access guarantees deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindexing speedVSAvoiduser access guarantees
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks to ensure that increasing the capacity threshold will not violate user access guarantees. By evaluating resource availability and user demand before allowing higher indexing capacity, the system can safely increase indexing speed when conditions permit while maintaining user access guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors user access performance and resource utilization in real-time, using this feedback to adjust the capacity threshold for indexing operations. When user access guarantees are at risk, the threshold is reduced. When resources are abundant and user performance is satisfied, the threshold can be increased to improve indexing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9898614B1Implicit prioritization to rate-limit secondary index creation for an online table
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9898614B1 patent drawing
  • US9898614B1 patent drawing
  • US9898614B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data storage system may implement implicit prioritization to rate-limit secondary index creation for an online table. A secondary index may be generated for a table stored in a data store. The table may be incrementally indexed, performing multiple indexing operations to populate the secondary index. Prior to performing an indexing operation, an evaluation of a capacity limitation for performing indexing operations may be made with respect to capacity to process access requests at the data store. If a determination is made that performance of the indexing operation exceeds the capacity limitation, then the indexing operation may be throttled. If a determination is made that performance of the indexing operation does not exceed the capacity limitation, then the indexing operation may be performed.