Imprint Apparatus Mold Substrate Deformation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional imprint apparatus techniques face challenges in achieving accurate overlay between a mold and a substrate due to shape difference corrections affecting positional shifts and magnification shifts, leading to increased correction time and deterioration in overlay accuracy, with hysteresis issues from force deformation mechanisms and unintended thermal corrections.

Innovation Solution

An imprint apparatus with a control unit that feedback-controls mold and substrate deformation units to maintain shape differences within allowable ranges, using difference data, target deformation amounts, and time-series deformation data to perform precise shape control on both the mold and substrate, minimizing the impact of shape corrections on positional shifts and preventing hysteresis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If shape difference correction is performed between mold and substrate, then overlay accuracy is improved, but correction time increases and productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay accuracyVSAvoidcorrection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary shape correction on the substrate using thermal deformation before the imprinting process begins. By pre-heating the substrate to induce controlled thermal expansion, the shape of the shot region is adjusted in advance to match the mold pattern, eliminating the need for time-consuming corrections during the actual imprinting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the conventional force deformation mechanism with a thermal deformation mechanism. Instead of applying mechanical force to deform the substrate, the system uses controlled heating to induce thermal expansion, which naturally adjusts the substrate shape. This substitution eliminates hysteresis effects and provides more predictable, repeatable deformation behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If force deformation mechanism is used for shape correction, then shape difference is corrected, but hysteresis occurs and overlay accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape correction accuracyVSAvoidoverlay accuracy stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the force deformation mechanism with a thermal deformation mechanism. By using controlled heating to induce thermal expansion in the substrate, the system achieves shape correction without the hysteresis effects that plague mechanical force application. The thermal field provides continuous, reversible control over substrate deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state parameters of the substrate by controlling temperature. By adjusting the thermal field distribution and intensity, the substrate undergoes controlled thermal expansion that matches the mold pattern. This parameter-based control (temperature) provides more stable and predictable deformation compared to force-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If thermal deformation mechanism is used for shape correction, then hysteresis is eliminated, but unintended thermal deformation may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation control stabilityVSAvoiddeformation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies thermal deformation locally to specific regions of the substrate rather than uniformly heating the entire substrate. By controlling the spatial distribution of the thermal field, only the shot region undergoes thermal expansion, while other areas remain unaffected. This localized approach prevents unintended deformation and maintains overall substrate integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback control to monitor and adjust the thermal deformation process. By measuring the actual shape of the shot region and comparing it to the target shape, the control unit adjusts the thermal field parameters in real-time to achieve precise deformation matching, eliminating both under-correction and over-correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate overlay between the mold and substrate in a shorter time, reducing the time required for correction and improving overlay accuracy by minimizing the influence of shape corrections on positional shifts and preventing hysteresis.

Implementation Method 1

a substrate deformation unit configured to deform the shot region on the substrate by applying heat to the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

a mold deformation unit configured to deform the pattern region of the mold by applying a force to the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11506974B2Imprint apparatus and article manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 CANON KK
  • US11506974B2 patent drawing
  • US11506974B2 patent drawing
  • US11506974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides an imprint apparatus including a control unit that feedback-controls a mold deformation unit based on difference data indicating a shape difference between a pattern region of a mold and a shot region on a substrate, target data indicating a relative target deformation amount between the pattern region of the mold and the shot region on the substrate, and time series data indicating a relative deformation amount between the pattern region of the mold and the shot region on the substrate which changes at each time while performing shape control on the shot region.