Simulation Apparatus for Imprint Droplet Spread Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing imprint techniques face challenges in consistently forming high-quality patterns due to defects caused by mold pattern differences and manufacturing variations, leading to the need for repeated imprint processes and drop recipe adjustments, which are time-consuming and inefficient, especially in predicting the spread shape of droplets in the periphery of the shot region.

Innovation Solution

A simulation apparatus that predicts the spread shape of boundary droplets in the periphery of the shot region by acquiring droplet placement information and using a prediction unit to differentiate the spread region from the standard droplet region, allowing for accurate and rapid adjustment of drop placement to minimize defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fluid flow calculation is used to simulate drop spread shape, then prediction accuracy in periphery region is improved, but calculation time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into two distinct regions: a first region where drops are surrounded by other drops, and a second region (periphery) where drops are not surrounded. Different prediction methods are applied to each region, allowing accurate simulation of periphery drops without calculating all drops using the resource-intensive fluid flow method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different prediction approaches are used for different spatial locations. The Voronoi diagram method is applied to interior drops where it provides sufficient accuracy, while fluid flow calculation is reserved only for periphery drops where high accuracy is critical. This local differentiation optimizes the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If repeated imprint processes are performed to correct defects, then pattern quality is improved, but manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The spread shape of periphery drops is predicted accurately using fluid flow calculation before the imprint process begins. This preliminary prediction allows for pre-adjustment of the drop recipe to prevent defects, eliminating the need for repeated trial-and-error imprint processes and enabling quality improvement without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If Voronoi diagram is used to predict drop spread, then calculation speed is improved, but prediction accuracy in periphery region deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into two distinct regions: a first region where drops are surrounded by other drops, and a second region (periphery) where drops are not surrounded. Different prediction methods are applied to each region, allowing accurate simulation of periphery drops without calculating all drops using the resource-intensive fluid flow method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different prediction approaches are used for different spatial locations. The Voronoi diagram method is applied to interior drops where it provides sufficient accuracy, while fluid flow calculation is reserved only for periphery drops where high accuracy is critical. This local differentiation optimizes the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240353762A1Simulation apparatus, simulation method, program recording medium, and method of manufacturing article
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 CANON KK
  • US20240353762A1 patent drawing
  • US20240353762A1 patent drawing
  • US20240353762A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a simulation apparatus configured to, in a process of bringing a member into contact with a plurality of droplets placed on a substrate to form a film of a curable composition on the substrate, highly accurately and rapidly predict spread of boundary droplets located in a boundary region which is a region on the substrate corresponding to at least an edge of the member when the member is contacted. The simulation apparatus includes an acquisition unit configured to acquire information indicating placement of the plurality of droplets on the substrate and a first droplet region which is a predicted region in which each of the droplets spreads around the droplet, and a prediction unit configured to predict, as a second droplet region, a region in which each of the boundary droplets spreads around the boundary droplet in a different way from the first droplet region of droplets other than the boundary droplet in the first droplet region acquired by the acquisition unit.