Imprint Lithography Fluid Drop Pattern Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current imprint lithography systems face challenges in achieving complete filling of substrate features and forming a uniform residual layer during the nano-fabrication process, as they rely on Drop-on-Demand technology which may not accurately distribute fluid volumes to match the spatial requirements of complex patterns.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a modified Lloyd's method to generate a fluid drop pattern, which involves creating a fluid map and optimizing drop locations to ensure equal volume distribution across the substrate, allowing for precise replication of the imprinting surface by applying polymerizable material according to the pattern and solidifying it to form a patterned layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If Drop-on-Demand technology is used to apply fluid, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inaccurate fluid volume distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid application systemVSAvoidfluid volume distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and pre-planning the fluid drop pattern using modified Lloyd's method before the actual imprinting process. The fluid map is generated in advance, determining optimal drop locations and volumes to compensate for subsequent spreading behavior, thereby achieving precise fluid distribution without requiring complex real-time control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If fluid is applied to fill substrate features, then complete filling is achieved, but residual layer uniformity deteriorates due to variable fluid distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature filling completenessVSAvoidresidual layer uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the fluid drop volume and location based on local feature requirements. The fluid map calculates different drop volumes for different regions of the substrate, with larger drops in regions requiring more fluid to fill deep or large features, and smaller drops in regions where less fluid is needed, thereby achieving both complete filling and uniform residual layer thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using the known substrate feature geometry and expected fluid spreading behavior to iteratively optimize the fluid drop pattern. The modified Lloyd's method incorporates feedback loops that adjust drop locations and volumes based on simulated fluid distribution results, ensuring that the final pattern achieves both complete feature filling and uniform residual layer formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If modified Lloyd's method is used to generate fluid drop pattern, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to computational requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern replication accuracyVSAvoidpattern generation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies mechanics substitution by replacing complex mechanical fluid distribution systems with a computational approach. Instead of using mechanically complex multi-nozzle arrays or precision positioning systems, the invention uses modified Lloyd's method to calculate optimal drop patterns, substituting mechanical complexity with computational algorithms that run on standard computing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures complete filling of substrate features and the formation of a uniformly thick residual layer, effectively replicating the imprinting surface with precise size and shape matching, thereby enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of the nano-fabrication process.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the fluid with a template to spread the fluid on the substrate, and solidifying the fluid to form a patterned layer on the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS8119052B2Drop pattern generation for imprint lithography
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 MOLECULAR IMPRINTS INC
  • US8119052B2 patent drawing
  • US8119052B2 patent drawing
  • US8119052B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Generating a fluid drop pattern for an imprint lithography process includes selecting an imprinting surface with features and generating a fluid drop pattern including drop locations for placement of a multiplicity of drops of substantially equal volume on an imprint lithography substrate such that some of the drops are substantially aligned with at least some of the features. The fluid drop pattern is generated through an optimization process. The fluid drop pattern allows substantially complete filling of imprinting surface features and formation of a substantially uniform residual layer during the imprint lithography process.