Imprint Lithography Meandering Order for Magnification Error Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Imprint lithography methods face magnification errors due to temperature differences in the substrate and template, leading to inconsistent pattern features and potential functional discrepancies in devices fabricated from these patterns.

Innovation Solution

The method involves controlling the order of pattern imprinting such that consecutively imprinted patterns are not adjacent to each other, and using dummy imprints or heating to stabilize the template temperature, ensuring consistent thermal conditions across the substrate and template.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If patterns are imprinted in sequential order on adjacent areas of the substrate, then the imprinting process is simple and fast, but temperature differences cause magnification errors and inconsistent pattern features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern feature consistencyVSAvoidimprinting process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The imprinting process is segmented into multiple passes or groups, where patterns are divided into different imaging zones. The template is repositioned between imprints to ensure that consecutively imprinted patterns are not adjacent, thereby reducing thermal accumulation effects on any single substrate area while maintaining overall productivity through systematic coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate and template are pre-heated to a controlled temperature before the imprinting process begins. This preliminary thermal conditioning ensures that the substrate is in a stable thermal state, reducing magnification errors during subsequent imprinting operations while allowing efficient sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If the substrate and template are heated to reduce magnification errors, then pattern feature consistency improves, but the complexity of temperature control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnification error controlVSAvoidtemperature control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate and template are heated to the same controlled temperature, creating a thermal equipotential state where no significant temperature differences exist between the two components. This eliminates thermal expansion mismatches and magnification errors without requiring complex differential control systems, as both components are maintained at identical thermal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature of the substrate and template is changed to an optimized value that minimizes magnification errors. By adjusting this thermal parameter to a specific set point, the system achieves consistent pattern features while using relatively simple temperature control mechanisms rather than complex multi-parameter control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces and stabilizes magnification errors, making it easier to correct for any remaining errors and ensuring consistent pattern features across the substrate, thereby improving the reliability and consistency of devices fabricated from these patterns.

Implementation Method 1

The template is pressed against the resist layer, the molecular layer being disposed upon the features. When the template is pressed against the resist layer, the layer of molecules 11 are transferred onto the resist.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the pattern is frozen by curing the resin with UV radiation that is applied through the quartz template onto the resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 3

The thermoplastic resin is heated so that it is in a freely flowable state immediately prior to imprinting with the template. It may be necessary to heat a thermoplastic resin to a temperature considerably above the glass transition temperature of the resin.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal Energy: Heating

Implementation Method 4

The template is pressed into the flowable resin and then cooled to below its glass transition temperature with the template in place to harden the pattern.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlass transition: Phase Change

Implementation Method 5

A magnification error can arise, for instance, due to a difference in temperature of the region in which a pattern is imprinted from an expected or design temperature. For example, there may be relative expansion or contraction of parts of the substrate due to a difference in temperature of those parts of the substrate.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS7854877B2Lithography meandering order
Publication Date: 2010.12.21 ASML NETHERLANDS BV
  • US7854877B2 patent drawing
  • US7854877B2 patent drawing
  • US7854877B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An imprint lithography method is disclosed, which includes imprinting a plurality of patterns in an imprintable medium provided on a substrate, wherein the order in which the patterns are imprinted in the imprintable medium is such that, for the majority of the patterns, two consecutively imprinted patterns are not imprinted adjacent to one another.