Impulse Propulsion With Counter-Rotating Tube Propellers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current space propulsion systems face inefficiencies in specific impulse and thrust, leading to long mission times and high fuel consumption, with electric propulsion systems requiring months to reach desired orbits and chemical systems needing large fuel masses, while also limiting orbital maneuvers and being susceptible to space debris impacts.

Innovation Solution

A propulsion system utilizing counter-rotating longitudinal tubes with projectiles and propellers that convert translational movement into rotational movement, dissipating heat and using a non-isolated system design to achieve impulse thrust, reducing fuel consumption and increasing maneuverability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If electric propulsion is used to achieve high specific impulse, then fuel consumption is reduced, but mission time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system uses periodic impulse thrust generated by projectiles being accelerated and ejected from longitudinal tubes, creating pulsed propulsion rather than continuous thrust. This allows the system to achieve high delta-v with minimal propellant while maintaining reasonable transit times through repeated short bursts of acceleration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state and parameters of projectiles (accelerating them to high velocities using electromagnetic or mechanical means) to generate impulse thrust. By varying projectile mass, velocity, and ejection frequency, the system optimizes both fuel efficiency and mission duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If chemical propulsion is used to achieve high thrust, then mission time is reduced, but fuel mass increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemission timeVSAvoidfuel mass
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system divides the thrust generation into multiple independent longitudinal tubes, each containing projectiles that can be accelerated and ejected independently. This segmentation allows for high instantaneous thrust when multiple tubes fire simultaneously while using minimal propellant mass compared to chemical systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional propulsion systems are used, then orbital plane changes are possible, but fuel consumption becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorbital maneuverabilityVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The propulsion system employs multiple pairs of longitudinal tubes that can be activated in different configurations and orientations. By selectively firing specific tubes at different times and angles, the system can perform various orbital maneuvers including plane changes with minimal propellant consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic impulse thrust from projectiles to achieve orbital plane changes through repeated small adjustments rather than large single burns, reducing overall fuel consumption while maintaining maneuverability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces travel time to desired orbits and minimizes fuel requirements, enhances orbital maneuverability, and reduces the impact of space debris, offering a more efficient and versatile propulsion solution.

Implementation Method 1

Thanks to the viscosity of the fluid, the propeller is arranged to transform a translational movement of the projectile into a rotational movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity: Viscous Heating

Implementation Method 2

another part will be transformed, depending on the nature of the braking device, either into heat or into electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

a heat dissipation device arranged to remove heat from the internal volume of the longitudinal tube containing the projectile and the propeller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat dissipation: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentEP4457145B1Impulse propulsion system
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 WARPA (WORLD ADVANCE RES PROJECT AGENCY)
  • EP4457145B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4457145B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The invention relates to a propulsion system comprising a motor comprising a pair of parallel longitudinal tubes (100), each longitudinal tube comprising a first end (10) and a second end (11) and delimiting an internal volume (12) filled with a fluid. Each longitudinal tube (100) comprises: - a projectile (200), configured to move longitudinally in the internal volume, securely attached to a propeller (201), - a mechanism for launching the projectile in the internal volume (12) from the first end, the propeller (201) being designed to convert a translational movement of the projectile (200) into a rotational movement, - a device for slowing the rotation of the projectile (200) in the internal volume (12), this device being positioned at the second end, - a device for returning the projectile (200) toward the first end, - a device for dissipating heat, the propellers of the longitudinal tubes being contrarotating.