Hierarchical IMS Subscription Model for Parental Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IMS network mechanisms lack parental control over children's activities, allowing unsupervised access to IMS services by minors.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a hierarchical IMS subscription model with 'primary' and 'secondary' IMPIs, where only primary IMPIs can register independently, and secondary IMPIs require explicit registration by primary IMPIs, along with a barring mechanism to control registration and call establishment procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If all IMPIs are allowed to register independently in the IMS network, then each user can access services autonomously, but parental control over children's activities cannot be implemented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous registrationVSAvoidparental control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments IMPIs into two distinct categories: primary IMPIs (for parents) and secondary IMPIs (for children). This segmentation allows different registration behaviors - primary IMPIs can register autonomously while secondary IMPIs require explicit registration by a primary IMPI, thereby enabling parental control while maintaining ease of operation for authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different registration policies to different IMPIs based on their type. Primary IMPIs have the quality of autonomous registration capability, while secondary IMPIs have the quality of requiring parental registration. This local differentiation of qualities resolves the contradiction by allowing autonomous operation where needed while restricting it where control is required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If secondary IMPIs are barred from registering without primary IMPI consent, then parental control is achieved, but the registration process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparental control capabilityVSAvoidregistration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service mechanisms where the HSS automatically determines whether an IMPI is primary or secondary based on stored type information. When a registration request arrives, the HSS autonomously checks the IMPI type and either permits or blocks registration without requiring complex manual verification, thus maintaining simplicity while achieving parental control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary configuration of IMPI types during subscription setup. The HSS stores the type information (primary/secondary) in advance, so that during the actual registration process, the system only needs to check pre-stored data rather than performing complex real-time verification, reducing registration process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the HSS stores and checks IMPI types for every registration request, then parental control is enforced, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparental control enforcementVSAvoidregistration processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The HSS performs preliminary configuration of IMPI types during subscription setup and stores this information in advance. During registration processing, the system only needs to retrieve and check pre-stored type information rather than performing complex real-time verification, thus maintaining reliable parental control enforcement while minimizing processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex real-time verification mechanisms with simple data retrieval and comparison operations. Instead of implementing sophisticated parental consent verification protocols during registration, the system substitutes this with a straightforward check of pre-stored IMPI type flags in the HSS, significantly improving processing efficiency while maintaining control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2340640B1Method, apparatuses and computer program for parental control over children's activities in an IMS network
Publication Date: 2012.02.01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP2340640B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2340640B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2340640B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention faces the issue of exercising a parental control over children's activities in the IMS network, in terms of registering into the IMS network as well as in terms of call establishment, and provides for a new IMS subscription model supporting a hierarchy of IMPI's, so-called 'primary' IMPI's and so-called 'secondary' IMPI's, whereby only the primary IMPI's are allowed to register themselves, whereas the secondary IMPI's can only register themselves after having been previously registered by a primary IMPI. To this end, the present invention provides for a new method and an enhanced HSS to allow the implicit registration of one or more 'secondary' IMPI's upon the explicit registration of an IMS subscriber with a given IMPI/IMPU pair, wherein the given IMPI is a 'primary' IMPI and the given IMPU is associated with a registration set of IMPI's which includes said one or more 'secondary' IMPI's.