IMS Network Element Probation Mode Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communication networks face challenges in efficiently deploying and testing new network elements, such as P-CSCF, S-CSCF, and application servers, due to the need for controlled user access and gradual integration into production networks, which is not effectively managed by existing systems.

Innovation Solution

A deployment system that designates network elements into a probation mode, limits their use to specific testing devices, generates configuration information, and gradually transitions them from probation to normal operation, allowing controlled user access and eventual full integration into the IMS network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If new network elements are deployed directly into production network, then deployment speed is improved, but network stability and reliability deteriorate due to untested elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network element deployment process into distinct phases: probation mode with limited testing device access, and full production mode. This segmentation allows controlled introduction of new elements without compromising overall network stability, resolving the contradiction between deployment speed and network reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary testing in a probation mode before full production deployment. Network elements undergo testing with designated testing devices during a probation period, allowing validation of element functionality and stability before committing to full production use, thus ensuring reliability while maintaining reasonable deployment pace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If network elements are tested with multiple user devices simultaneously, then testing completeness is improved, but access control and security management deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting completenessVSAvoidaccess control management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating distinct access regimes for different device types. Testing devices receive special probation mode access with specific permissions, while regular user devices follow standard access procedures. This localized differentiation enables comprehensive testing with controlled access management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If network elements undergo extensive testing before deployment, then element reliability is improved, but time-to-market for new services deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement reliabilityVSAvoidtime-to-market
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic deployment approach where network elements transition from probation mode to full production mode based on testing results and performance metrics. This dynamic progression allows accelerated time-to-market for elements that pass testing quickly, while maintaining rigorous validation for elements requiring extended testing, thus balancing reliability with speed to market.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8902787B2Apparatus and method for deploying network elements
Publication Date: 2014.12.02 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8902787B2 patent drawing
  • US8902787B2 patent drawing
  • US8902787B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that incorporates teachings of the present disclosure may include, for example, a server having a controller adapted to determine at least one network element to be designated as being in a probation mode where the network element is operably coupled to an Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) network and is adapted to utilize Session Initiation Protocol, and determine communication devices to be designated as testing devices where the communication devices are user end point devices, wherein use of the network element for communication between user end points over the IMS network is limited to the testing devices. Other embodiments are disclosed.