Wireless Device IMS Transfer Address Selection for Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication devices (WCDs) configured to support both single radio voice call continuity (SRVCC) and dual radio voice call continuity (DRVCC) face handover failures due to receiving different IMS transfer-addresses from the IMS when transitioning between RANs, leading to incorrect routing of signaling messages.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where the WCD maintains and selects between two IMS transfer-addresses, one for single-radio transitions and another for dual-radio transitions, ensuring the appropriate address is used for seamless handover during RAN changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the WCD receives different IMS transfer-addresses from the IMS when transitioning between RANs for SRVCC and DRVCC, then the WCD can support both single-radio and dual-radio voice call continuity, but handover failures occur due to incorrect routing of signaling messages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for both SRVCC and DRVCCVSAvoidhandover success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the single IMS transfer-address into two distinct addresses: one for SRVCC (single-radio voice call continuity) and one for DRVCC (dual-radio voice call continuity). This segmentation allows the system to maintain separate routing paths for different handover types, eliminating the conflict that arises when a single address must serve multiple purposes. The WCD now has dedicated addresses for each handover mode, ensuring correct routing without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If the WCD uses a single IMS transfer-address for all handovers, then the device complexity is reduced, but handover failures occur when transitioning between different RAN types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of IMS transfer-addressesVSAvoidhandover success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic address selection mechanism where the WCD automatically chooses the appropriate IMS transfer-address based on the current handover scenario. The system dynamically determines whether SRVCC or DRVCC is being performed and selects the corresponding address. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain simplicity in operation (the WCD doesn't need to manually configure addresses) while achieving high reliability through context-aware address selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the WCD stores multiple IMS transfer-addresses for different handover types, then handover reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover success rateVSAvoidmanagement of multiple IMS transfer-addresses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the WCD to autonomously manage multiple IMS transfer-addresses without requiring complex external configuration or intervention. The device automatically receives the appropriate addresses from the network, stores them in association with their respective handover types (SRVCC/DRVCC), and independently selects the correct address during handover operations. This self-service capability allows the WCD to handle the complexity of multiple addresses internally while presenting a simple interface to the user and network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the WCD selects the wrong IMS transfer-address during handover, then signaling messages are incorrectly routed, but the WCD could otherwise support seamless handover

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseamless handover capabilityVSAvoidcorrect routing information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the WCD determines the appropriate handover type (SRVCC or DRVCC) based on current network conditions and device state, then uses this information to select the corresponding IMS transfer-address. The system continuously monitors handover requirements and adjusts address selection accordingly, ensuring that the correct routing information is always used. This feedback loop prevents the loss of routing information by actively matching the selected address to the actual handover scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9532276B1Hybrid call continuity for a wireless communication device
Publication Date: 2016.12.27 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US9532276B1 patent drawing
  • US9532276B1 patent drawing
  • US9532276B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication device (WCD) is configured to receive and maintain concurrently in data storage at least two different IMS transfer-addresses, such as one for use when the WCD's transition between radio access networks (RANs) is a single-radio transition and the other for use when the WCD's transition between RANs is a dual-radio transition, and/or one for use when the WCD's transition between RANs is packet-to-packet and the other for use when the WCD's transition between RANs is packet-to-circuit. Upon transitioning between RANs, the WCD may then select the appropriate one of these IMS transfer-addresses and transmit the selected IMS transfer-address to a network node to facilitate handover of an ongoing call to be via the WCD's new serving RAN.