IMU Drop Detection With Adaptive Sampling and Rotation Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting device drops face challenges in balancing high signal resolution and low power consumption, and accurately determining drop events due to varying rotation and sensor positioning in mobile devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor to detect angular velocity and proper acceleration, combined with adaptive sampling and device-aware algorithms, to determine free fall and impact events, while correcting intrinsic device parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a high sampling rate is used for sensor data collection, then signal resolution is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal resolutionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sampling rate adjustment based on device state. The system transitions between low sampling rate (normal state) and high sampling rate (drop detection state), allowing high signal resolution only when needed for drop detection while maintaining low power consumption during normal operation. This is achieved through state-machine based control that activates high-rate sampling only when drop indicators are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the sampling rate parameter dynamically based on detected conditions. When the device is in a normal state, a low sampling rate is used to conserve energy. When indicators such as angular velocity thresholds or acceleration patterns suggest a drop event, the system switches to a high sampling rate to capture detailed motion data for accurate drop verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If device parameters are corrected to improve detection accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidparameter correction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary correction of device parameters during manufacturing or initial setup. Intrinsic parameters such as center of mass position, moment of inertia, and sensor orientation are calibrated beforehand and stored in the device. During runtime, these pre-corrected parameters are used directly without requiring complex real-time calculations, thus improving detection accuracy while avoiding increased operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses pre-measured or pre-calculated device parameters (copies of the actual physical properties) to simplify runtime operations. Instead of measuring physical properties like moment of inertia or center of mass during operation, the system uses stored parameter values that represent these properties, enabling accurate drop detection without complex real-time physics calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Accurately detects and verifies drop events with high resolution and low power consumption by adapting sampling rates and refining device parameters, enhancing detection accuracy and reducing false positives.

Implementation Method 1

obtaining an angular velocity and a proper acceleration of the electronic device based on sensor data received from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

A typical drop event consists of two events, a free fall followed by an impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFree fall: Free Fall

Implementation Method 3

based on an acceleration difference between the centripetal acceleration and the proper acceleration, determining whether the electronic device is in a fall state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

detecting an impact on the electronic device based on a magnitude of the proper acceleration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS12487250B2Apparatus and method for detecting device drop
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12487250B2 patent drawing
  • US12487250B2 patent drawing
  • US12487250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting a drop event of an electronic device, may include: obtaining an angular velocity and a proper acceleration of the electronic device based on sensor data received from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor of the electronic device; obtaining centripetal acceleration of the electronic device based on the angular velocity, principal moments of inertia of the electronic device, and position of the IMU sensor within the electronic device; based on an acceleration difference between the centripetal acceleration and the proper acceleration, determining whether the electronic device is in a fall state; and based on the electronic device being determined to be in the fall state, providing an analysis result of the drop event.