Travel Environment Recognition Using IMU-Corrected Road Gradient

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing travel environment recognition systems require complex calculation and image processing to estimate three-dimensional structures of road boundaries, leading to increased processing loads and potential inaccuracies in gradient recognition, which can hinder accurate lane keeping and self-driving capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus that utilizes an imaging unit, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and a microprocessor to detect external situations and vehicle states, correcting road gradient recognition based on IMU data to reduce processing complexity and improve accuracy, using a gradient value correction unit to adjust road gradient values and division line recognition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If three-dimensional structure estimation is performed based on captured images, then traveling path recognition capability is improved, but processing load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraveling path recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary correction mechanism that uses IMU detection values as a mediator to adjust the recognition results. Instead of performing complex three-dimensional structure estimation directly from images, the system uses the IMU data as an intermediate reference to correct the gradient recognition, thereby reducing processing complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex image processing and three-dimensional structure estimation mechanism with a simpler correction mechanism based on IMU detection. By substituting the mechanical/image processing system with an inertial measurement-based correction system, the processing load is significantly reduced while preserving the essential functionality of accurate path recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If complex image processing is used for boundary line estimation, then environment recognition capability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironment recognition accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary correction by using IMU detection values to adjust the recognition results before final path planning. This preliminary action based on inertial data allows the system to quickly compensate for gradient recognition errors without waiting for time-consuming image processing to complete, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes time-consuming complex image processing with a faster inertial measurement-based correction system. The IMU-based correction mechanism processes data much faster than traditional image processing pipelines, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining or improving recognition accuracy through direct physical measurement of vehicle state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If gradient change is not properly corrected, then processing simplicity is maintained, but recognition accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidgradient recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where IMU detection values are continuously used to correct recognition results. The system feeds back the vehicle state information from the IMU to adjust and refine the gradient recognition, ensuring high accuracy is maintained even on roads with gradient changes, while keeping the processing mechanism relatively simple through this closed-loop correction approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Accurately recognizes travel environments and lane boundaries with reduced processing load, enabling precise self-driving even on gradient-changing roads, enhancing safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

an inertial measurement unit (IMU) that detects an attitude angle of the subject vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS12475721B2Travel environment recognition apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12475721B2 patent drawing
  • US12475721B2 patent drawing
  • US12475721B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A travel environment recognition apparatus includes: an external situation detection unit configured to detect an external situation around a subject vehicle; a state detection unit configured to detect a state of the subject vehicle; a microprocessor and a memory coupled to the microprocessor. The microprocessor is configured to perform: recognizing a travel environment in front of the subject vehicle based on a detection value of the external situation detection unit; and correcting a recognition result of the environment recognition unit based on the detection value of the state detection unit.