In-Bath Additive Manufacturing of Silicone Elastomers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing methods lack the ability to vary material characteristics within a component during production and are unable to efficiently produce strong, resilient, and dimensionally stable silicone elastomer components, particularly at room temperature.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a bath of silicone gel with a dispenser of a liquid catalyst to actively cross-link and accelerate the hardening of the material, allowing for variation of characteristics such as hardness, flexibility, and color by changing the curing agent, enabling the production of components with multiple properties and geometries without the need for molding or casting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a bath of liquid base material is used with successive layer solidification, then uniform material characteristics are achieved, but the ability to vary material characteristics within the component is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform material characteristicsVSAvoidability to vary material characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by enabling different material characteristics at different locations within the component. The digital model allows specification of varying material properties (such as density, strength, or composition) for different regions of the component, and the additive manufacturing process deposits material accordingly, achieving spatially varying material characteristics while maintaining overall composition stability through controlled layer-by-layer construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional additive manufacturing methods are used, then simple geometries can be produced, but complex geometries and multi-grade components cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of production processVSAvoidability to produce complex geometries and multi-grade components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing a dynamic and flexible manufacturing process that can adapt to complex geometries. The digital model serves as a dynamic blueprint that can be modified to specify varying material characteristics and complex shapes, and the additive manufacturing process dynamically adjusts material deposition patterns, layer thicknesses, and construction sequences to achieve the desired complex geometries and multi-grade components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If material is removed by conventional machining techniques, then precise shapes can be achieved, but material waste and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of shapeVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using additive manufacturing to build components directly from digital models, constructing the final shape by adding material layer-by-layer according to precise digital specifications. This eliminates the need for preliminary roughing operations and subsequent precision machining, achieving manufacturing precision through the digital design and controlled material deposition process itself, while minimizing material waste since only the necessary material is deposited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the rapid production of three-dimensional components with varied properties, including strength, resilience, and visual characteristics, enabling the creation of complex geometries and multi-grade silicone components, enhancing the versatility and efficiency of additive manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

dispensing a fluid curing agent in said bath in a pattern defined by a digital record, said curing agent converting said base material to a solid in the vicinity thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCross-linking: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The catalyst may cause a controlled vulcanisation of the silicone gel, which accelerates a hardening of the fluid base material in the vicinity of the catalyst

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVulcanisation: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3060380B1Method and apparatus for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 FRIPP DESIGN
  • EP3060380B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3060380B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3060380B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A method and device for producing a three-dimensional component byin-bath additive manufacturing comprising a bath (12) of a first fluid component and a nozzle (15) for dispensing a second fluid component. In use the nozzle is moved in the bath, and the fluid components react to produce said component. The second fluid component may be varied to change the visual and/or physical properties of the component. A computer (24) contains a digital record to control respective position of the nozzle and the bath.