In-Chamber Electron Detector Vacuum Signal Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing charged particle beam systems face limitations in detector flexibility and longevity due to the inflexibility of scintillator positioning and significant signal loss through optical components in conventional detectors, leading to reduced efficiency and shorter detector lifetimes.

Innovation Solution

A secondary particle detector with a scintillator and transducer, such as a photomultiplier tube, photodiode, or phototransistor, positioned entirely within the sample vacuum chamber, eliminating the need for light pipes and allowing for improved positioning and increased signal collection efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional ET detector with light pipe is used to detect secondary electrons, then the detector can be positioned outside the vacuum chamber, but significant signal loss occurs through the optical components and the scintillator positioning is inflexible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector lifetimeVSAvoidsignal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the photomultiplier tube from the vacuum chamber environment and positions it outside, eliminating the need for a light pipe to conduct light through the chamber wall. The scintillator remains inside the chamber close to the sample, while the PMT detects light externally, removing the signal loss pathway through optical interfaces and vacuum seals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a transparent window as an intermediary element that allows light to pass from the scintillator inside the vacuum chamber to the photomultiplier tube outside, while maintaining vacuum integrity. This window serves as a mediator that eliminates the need for complex light pipe assemblies and reduces signal loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the scintillator is positioned close to the work piece to maximize signal collection, then signal collection efficiency improves, but the rigid light pipe structure limits positioning flexibility and system reconfiguration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal collection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem reconfiguration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detector system into two separate components: the scintillator positioned inside the vacuum chamber close to the work piece for optimal signal collection, and the photomultiplier tube positioned outside the chamber. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component's position and eliminates the constraints of a rigid integrated light pipe structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimension constrained system (light pipe length and routing) to a multi-dimensional configuration where the scintillator can be positioned optimally in three-dimensional space inside the chamber, while the PMT is freely positionable outside the chamber, adding spatial flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple accessories are positioned near the work piece to enhance functionality, then system capability improves, but space congestion increases and detector positioning becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidspace management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the photomultiplier tube from the congested vacuum chamber environment and positions it outside, removing it from the space management problem. This allows multiple accessories to be positioned near the work piece inside the chamber without competing for space with the detector components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances signal collection efficiency, extends detector lifetime, and provides greater flexibility in system reconfiguration, enabling better image quality and reduced damage to the work piece during scanning.

Implementation Method 1

impact a scintillator 108, which is composed of a material, (such as a phosphor, a light-emitting plastic or a garnet oxide) that emits light (called cathodoluminescence) when impacted by charged particles such as electrons 142

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCathodoluminescence: Cathodoluminescence

Implementation Method 2

The light is typically conducted by a rigid light pipe 110, a solid plastic or glass rod passing through a sealed port in the specimen chamber, through a transparent window 112 in the vacuum chamber to a photomultiplier tube (PMT) 114 that is positioned outside the vacuum chamber. In PMT 114, the light causes the emission of electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8164059B2In-chamber electron detector
Publication Date: 2012.04.24 FEI CO
  • US8164059B2 patent drawing
  • US8164059B2 patent drawing
  • US8164059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary particle detector 302 for a charged particle beam system 300 includes a scintillator 304 and a transducer 312, such as a photomultiplier tube, positioned within a vacuum chamber 107. Unlike prior art Everhart-Thornley detectors, the photomultiplier is positioned within the vacuum chamber, which improves detection by eliminating optical couplings and provides flexibility in positioning the detector.