In-Computer Fire Suppression via Optical Flame Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In computer systems, high impedance short circuits can lead to small fires that may not be detected by power supply over-current detection, allowing the fire to spread before being addressed, potentially endangering other servers and computers due to insufficient smoke production.

Innovation Solution

In-computer fire suppression systems that include a flame detector and a fire extinguisher, which detect flames and release an extinguishing agent while disabling the power supply to the affected area, thereby controlling the fire and preventing further damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If power supply over-current detection is used to detect fires, then the detection system is simple, but it fails to detect high impedance short circuits that cause small fires

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electrical-based detection (over-current detection) with optical-based detection (flame detection). The flame detector uses optical sensors to detect the presence of flames by analyzing light characteristics, thereby overcoming the limitation of electrical detection methods that fail to detect high impedance short circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from electrical current to optical properties of flames. By detecting parameters such as ultraviolet radiation, infrared radiation, or visible light characteristics unique to flames, the system can reliably detect fires caused by high impedance short circuits that electrical methods miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If smoke detectors are used to detect fires, then the detection method is simple, but small fires do not produce enough smoke to trigger detection until the fire has spread

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveearly fire detection capabilityVSAvoidtime for fire to spread before detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces smoke-based detection with direct flame detection using optical sensors. This substitution allows the system to detect fires at their inception when flames are present but smoke production is insufficient, enabling early detection before the fire spreads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The flame detection system performs preliminary detection of fire conditions before smoke accumulates to detectable levels. By detecting the optical signature of flames early in the fire development process, the system enables timely response before the fire spreads to endanger other equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If high impedance short circuits occur, then the power supply continues to supply current, but this allows the fire to spread before being detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation of power supplyVSAvoidfire spread
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where the flame detector continuously monitors for fire conditions and provides feedback to the power supply control. When flames are detected, the system immediately responds by shutting off power supply, creating a closed-loop control that prevents fire spread while maintaining continuous operation during normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by preparing to shut off power supply upon detection of fire conditions. The flame detector is positioned and calibrated to detect flames at early stages, enabling the power supply to be cut before the fire can spread, thereby preventing the harmful effect rather than responding after damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively suppresses fires within computer systems by quickly detecting flames and releasing an extinguishing agent, preventing the fire from spreading and minimizing damage to surrounding equipment.

Implementation Method 1

detecting, by an in-computer flame detector, a flame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation detection: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentUS8485271B2In-computer fire suppression
Publication Date: 2013.07.16 LENOVO GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES SWITZERLAND INTERNATIONAL GMBH
  • US8485271B2 patent drawing
  • US8485271B2 patent drawing
  • US8485271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In-computer fire suppression, the computer comprising an in-computer flame detector and an in-computer fire extinguisher including detecting, by an in-computer flame detector, a flame, releasing, by the in-computer fire extinguisher, an extinguishing agent in response to the flame detector detecting the flame; and disabling the power supply to the computer having within it the in-computer flame detector and the in-computer fire extinguisher.