In-editor spritesheeting dynamic arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current game development tools require inconvenient and time-consuming pre- or post-processing steps for spritesheets, leading to inefficiencies in editing and rendering, especially when changes are made, which can slow down the development workflow and result in misleading image quality differences between the editor and the built game.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically updates the arrangement of images on spritesheets in response to user input, rebuilding only the affected spritesheets and marking them for rendering, allowing for real-time editing and reduced processing demands, while maintaining the benefits of spritesheets within the development software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pre-processed spritesheets are imported to a game, then the game can use optimized image arrangements, but the editor becomes inconvenient to edit as changes require manual re-processing and re-importing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegame runtime efficiencyVSAvoideditor convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically updates spritesheets in the editor when images are modified, rather than requiring static pre-processing. The spritesheet arrangement is automatically regenerated and rendered in real-time during editing, making the system adaptive to user changes without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The editor automatically detects image changes and triggers spritesheet regeneration without user intervention. The system self-manages the workflow by monitoring image modifications and automatically updating the corresponding spritesheets, eliminating the need for manual re-processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If individual images are processed in the editor instead of spritesheets, then editing flexibility is improved, but memory usage increases and processing becomes slower

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting flexibilityVSAvoidmemory usage and processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple individual images into a single spritesheet structure during editing, allowing the editor to work with compact image data. By maintaining the spritesheet organization during the editing process, memory efficiency is preserved while still enabling flexible individual image editing through the spritesheet interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If entire spritesheets are rebuilt when an image is modified, then consistency is maintained, but processing time increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespritesheet consistencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the spritesheet update process by identifying and regenerating only the specific spritesheet containing the modified image, rather than rebuilding all spritesheets. This localized update approach maintains consistency where needed while minimizing unnecessary processing of unrelated spritesheets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different update strategies to different spritesheets based on their relationship to the modified image. Spritesheets containing the changed image are fully regenerated to maintain consistency, while unrelated spritesheets are left unchanged, optimizing processing time by applying quality updates only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If spritesheets are rendered immediately after editing, then real-time accuracy is achieved, but build time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage display accuracyVSAvoidbuild time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary arrangement of images on spritesheets during editing without immediate rendering. The spritesheet structure is prepared in advance with correct image placements, and rendering is deferred until the build process or when explicitly needed, separating the arrangement logic from the rendering operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10282202B2In-editor spritesheeting
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 SCIRRA LTD
  • US10282202B2 patent drawing
  • US10282202B2 patent drawing
  • US10282202B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure aim to improve upon methods and systems for arranging individual images onto a spritesheet in game development software. The arrangement of images is updated in response to user input as the user adds, modifies or deletes images in a development project. Part of the method includes limiting the maximum amount of processing required in response to a user's alteration of an image. From the user side, the user opens a project, which includes an image editor, adds an image to the project/modifies an image in the spritesheet/deletes an image; then commits a change to the image (by clicking “save” or simply closing an edit window); and the user continues editing the project, which might include loading a further image or continuing to work on game code. The project includes one or more spritesheets collections each including one or more spritesheets.