In-Flight Feature Modification for ML Training Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Organizations face challenges in implementing effective machine learning solutions due to the complexity of algorithms, the need for specialized expertise, and the resource-intensive process of generating, updating, and deploying machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of adaptive machine learning training via in-flight feature modification, which allows for the monitoring and modification of feature utilization and importance during the training process, enabling efficient adjustment of model quality without the need for multiple training runs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional machine learning training methods are used, then model quality can be achieved, but multiple training runs are required which consumes significant time and resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel qualityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feature modification during the training process. The training system continuously monitors feature importance metrics and automatically adjusts feature utilization in real-time without requiring multiple complete training runs. This dynamic adaptation allows the model to optimize its performance during a single training execution, resolving the contradiction between achieving high model quality and reducing training time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by monitoring training metrics and feature importance during the training process. Based on this feedback, the system automatically modifies feature utilization dynamically, allowing continuous optimization of model quality within a single training run rather than requiring multiple sequential runs, thereby reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If traditional machine learning training methods are used, then model training can be completed, but the process is extremely time and resource consumptive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic feature modification that adjusts feature utilization during training based on real-time performance metrics. This dynamic approach eliminates the need for multiple training runs, significantly improving training efficiency while reducing computational resource consumption and energy usage compared to traditional static training methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The training system performs self-optimization by automatically monitoring its own performance metrics and adjusting feature utilization without external intervention. This self-service capability improves training efficiency and reduces resource consumption by eliminating the need for multiple manual training runs and expert intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If machine learning models are highly specialized for particular use cases, then model accuracy is improved, but any change to the environment or use case requires complete regeneration of the model

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feature modification that allows the model to adapt its feature utilization during training based on performance metrics. This dynamic capability enables the model to maintain high accuracy for specific use cases while also being adaptable to environmental changes, as the feature modification can be re-applied when conditions change, avoiding complete model regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters dynamically during training by modifying feature utilization based on observed performance. This parameter change approach allows the model to be specialized for particular use cases while maintaining adaptability, as the same model can have its parameters adjusted through feature modification when environmental conditions or use cases change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If users lack machine learning expertise, then implementation is easier, but users cannot clean or preprocess data effectively or select appropriate algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation easeVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service data preprocessing and feature modification capabilities that automatically monitor training metrics and adjust feature utilization without requiring user expertise in machine learning, data cleaning, or algorithm selection. This maintains ease of operation while ensuring high data quality through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from training metrics to automatically determine appropriate data preprocessing and feature modifications, eliminating the need for users to have expertise in these areas while maintaining high data quality. The feedback-driven approach allows non-experts to achieve professional-level results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12293262B1Adaptive machine learning training via in-flight feature modification
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12293262B1 patent drawing
  • US12293262B1 patent drawing
  • US12293262B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for adaptive machine learning training via in-flight feature modification are described. A training monitor captures training data during the training of a machine learning model, and a metric generator creates metrics such as feature importance metrics based on the data. A rule evaluation engine determines whether any modification conditions are met for any of the features based on the metrics, and based on such a determination can cause the in-flight training job to be modified.