In-Flight Robotic Crew Assistant for Medical Emergency Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Crew members on vehicles, such as aircraft, face challenges in efficiently performing tasks during flights, particularly in medical emergencies due to communication issues and difficulty in accessing medical information or resources.

Innovation Solution

A robot system is introduced that includes a body, transportation system, communication link, and interaction system, allowing it to move through the cabin, interact with passengers or crew, and perform tasks such as medical assistance or trash removal based on received information, including remote guidance from medical professionals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If more crew members are assigned to perform tasks during the trip, then task completion quality improves, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion qualityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system performs tasks autonomously without requiring human crew intervention. The control system enables the robot to independently navigate, interact with passengers, and execute tasks such as delivering items, collecting trash, and providing information, thereby reducing the need for additional crew members while maintaining task completion quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces human crew members with an automated robotic system. The robot system comprises a body, transportation system for movement, interaction system for communication, and control system for autonomous operation, substituting mechanical automation for human labor in performing various in-flight tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If crew members focus on complex procedures, then procedure accuracy improves, but task execution speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocedure accuracyVSAvoidtask execution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system divides tasks into discrete, manageable components through its modular architecture. The transportation system handles movement, the interaction system manages communication, and the control system coordinates operations, allowing each subsystem to optimize its specific function while maintaining overall task accuracy and speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system adjusts operational parameters dynamically to balance accuracy and speed. By modifying navigation speed, interaction response time, and task execution parameters based on real-time conditions, the robot maintains high procedure accuracy while optimizing task execution speed for different scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If crew members handle multiple tasks simultaneously, then service coverage improves, but task performance quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidtask performance quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system is designed with multi-functional capabilities to perform various tasks including passenger interaction, item delivery, trash collection, and information provision. This universal design allows a single robot to cover multiple service areas and task types without compromising performance quality, as each function is executed by specialized subsystems coordinated by the control system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If medical information is made more accessible during emergencies, then response effectiveness improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interaction system serves as an intermediary between the control system and users, providing simplified access to medical information and resources. Through user-friendly interfaces including displays, speakers, and microphones, the robot delivers complex medical guidance and information in an accessible format without requiring users to understand the underlying system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10775793B2Systems and methods for in-flight crew assistance
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 THE BOEING CO
  • US10775793B2 patent drawing
  • US10775793B2 patent drawing
  • US10775793B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot system is provided that is configured for use on-board a vehicle during a trip of the vehicle. The vehicle includes a cabin. The robot system includes a body, a transportation system, a communication link, an interaction system, and a control system. The transportation system is coupled to the body and configured to move the body through at least a portion of the cabin. The communication link is configured to receive trip information. The interaction system is configured to interact with at least one of a passenger or a crew member disposed within the cabin during trip. The control system is configured to operate the robot system to perform a crew assistance task during the use of the vehicle responsive to at least one of the trip information or information received from the at least one of the passenger or crew member.