In-Memory Data Node Retention via Priority Scoring
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In-memory data processing systems face challenges in efficiently managing memory constraints, particularly when dealing with large datasets and complex processing procedures, where intermediary results often need to be regenerated due to memory limitations, making it difficult for developers to view and debug deep within processing graphs without re-processing the entire graph.
Innovation Solution
A system that optimizes in-memory data processing by detecting user interactions to minimize the number of data nodes that need to be re-run, prioritizes data nodes based on processing time and overlap with ancestor processes, and automatically flags nodes for memory retention, allowing it to clear lower-priority data first when memory pressure occurs, ensuring critical results are preserved for faster debugging and viewing.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Quantity of substance
If memory is cleared to accommodate large datasets, then memory capacity is improved, but data re-materialization time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by differentiating memory retention strategies across different data nodes based on their priority scores. Critical data nodes that are frequently accessed or处于浅层位置 retain their data in memory, while less critical nodes clear their data. This creates a non-uniform memory management approach where each data node has a different retention policy, resolving the contradiction between memory capacity and re-materialization time.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating priority scores for all data nodes before memory management decisions are made. These priority scores are used to determine which nodes should retain data in memory proactively, before memory pressure occurs. This preliminary classification allows the system to quickly make retention decisions during runtime without recalculating priorities, thus reducing re-materialization time while efficiently using memory capacity.
2Measurement precision
If entire processing graph is re-processed to see changes, then debugging accuracy is improved, but processing time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the processing graph into independent data nodes with calculated priority scores. When a change is detected, the system identifies and re-processes only the affected segments (nodes with priority above threshold) rather than the entire graph. This segmentation allows developers to maintain debugging accuracy by re-processing relevant portions while significantly improving processing speed by avoiding unnecessary re-computation of unrelated nodes.
Solution Approach 2:
The system applies partial action by re-processing only the necessary subset of data nodes required to observe the effects of changes, rather than performing excessive full-graph re-processing. The priority score threshold mechanism enables the system to perform just enough re-processing to achieve debugging goals, balancing accuracy requirements with productivity concerns.
3Speed
If data is retained in memory, then viewing speed is improved, but memory consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the parameter of memory retention by introducing dynamic priority scores that determine retention status. Instead of a static all-or-nothing approach, the system continuously adjusts which data nodes retain memory based on their priority scores, which are calculated based on factors like depth in processing graph and accessibility importance. This parameter-based approach optimizes the balance between viewing speed and memory consumption.
Solution Approach 2:
The memory retention strategy is made dynamic through the priority score mechanism. As data nodes are accessed, modified, or re-processed, their priority scores are updated, which dynamically changes their memory retention status. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt memory consumption to actual usage patterns, maintaining fast viewing speed for critical data while freeing memory for less critical nodes.
Data Source
AI summary
A network of data processing nodes is configured for in-memory data processing. The data processing nodes are interconnected in an acyclic manner, and are connected at an input end to one or more input data sources, and at an output end to one or more output data nodes. Each data processing node is configured to perform one or more data processing operations which generate respective result data that is used as one or both of (i) an input for another data processing node in the network, and (ii) an output to be sent to one of the output data nodes. The result data for each data processing node is stored in a memory of the respective data processing node. Each data processing node includes a flag having a state that controls storage persistence of the result data in the memory of the respective data processing node.


