In-Process Inspection Tool for AFP Composite Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated fiber placement (AFP) systems face significant challenges in efficient in-process inspection due to manual inspection processes being time-consuming, prone to human error, and requiring expert knowledge, which interrupts production and increases costs, especially for large-scale composite manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

An in-process inspection tool integrated with an AFP system, featuring a profiler and support bracket that allows for real-time surface profiling of fiber strips as they are placed, providing consistent and reliable feedback on defects without interfering with the fiber placement process, utilizing industrial robots and non-destructive testing instruments like laser profilers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection is used to detect defects in fiber strips, then defect detection capability is improved, but production time is significantly increased (20-70% of total production time)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidproduction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated optical inspection system using a camera and image processing algorithms. The system captures images of the fiber strip during AFP and automatically detects defects such as gaps, overlaps, and misalignments, eliminating the need for manual inspection while maintaining defect detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary inspection system that acts as a mediator between the AFP process and quality assurance. The optical inspection system serves as an intermediary device that automatically analyzes fiber strip quality without requiring production interruption or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual inspection is performed by skilled operators, then inspection accuracy is improved, but operator skill dependency and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-service by automatically detecting and classifying defects using image processing algorithms. The system does not require external expert knowledge or manual interpretation, as the automated algorithms independently analyze the captured images and identify defects such as gaps, overlaps, and misalignments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces human operators with an automated optical inspection system that uses computer vision and image processing. This substitution eliminates dependency on operator skill and training while maintaining consistent inspection accuracy through algorithmic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If visual inspection is used to identify defects, then simplicity of inspection method is maintained, but defect detection difficulty increases due to low contrast between substrate and incoming tows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection method simplicityVSAvoiddefect identification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective visual inspection with objective optical imaging and automated image processing. The camera system captures high-resolution images that enhance the visibility of defects, and the image processing algorithms automatically detect contrast differences between the substrate and incoming tows, overcoming the limitations of human visual perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the inspection parameters by using optical imaging with specific lighting conditions and image processing techniques that enhance contrast. The system adjusts imaging parameters such as lighting angle, exposure time, and image processing filters to improve defect visibility despite the inherently low contrast between substrate and tows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If AFP process is interrupted for manual inspection, then quality assurance is improved, but production efficiency and automation benefits are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous inspection by integrating the optical inspection system into the AFP process. The camera captures images of the fiber strip as it is being laid, allowing quality assurance to occur continuously without interrupting the automated fiber placement process. This maintains both high automation level and quality assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated optical inspection system serves as an intermediary that allows quality assurance to proceed simultaneously with the AFP process. The inspection system acts as a mediator that does not require process interruption, unlike manual inspection, thereby preserving automation benefits while ensuring quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly reduces manual inspection time, enhances production efficiency, and improves defect detection accuracy, enabling more automated and cost-effective manufacturing of complex composite parts by providing immediate feedback on defects during the AFP process.

Implementation Method 1

a profiler configured to output an in-process inspection signal representing a surface profile of a fiber strip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser scanning: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS20240278510A1In-process inspection tool
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 THE WICHITA STATE UNIV
  • US20240278510A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278510A1 patent drawing
  • US20240278510A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tool for use with Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) machines and systems for use in in-process inspection of composite parts. The AFP system uses a robot, fiber guide, compaction roller, heating system, and an in-process inspection tool. The in-process inspection tool utilizes at least one profiler housed within a support bracket, which mounts the profiler on an AFP head of the AFP system such that the profiler does not interfere with the AFP layup, but outputs an in-process inspection signal representing a surface profile of a fiber strip as it is placed onto a molding for a composite part by the AFP head.