In Situ Planar Surface Preparation via Ion Beam Sputtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sample preparation methods for microscopy, such as mechanical polishing and focused ion beam milling, are inadequate for novel multi-phase and multi-layered materials, as they often lead to structural alteration, charging effects, and distortion, making it difficult to achieve accurate characterization at the molecular or atomic level.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for in situ preparation of sequential planar surfaces using a sample support and an excitation beam source within a vacuum chamber, where a beam shield is adjusted to selectively expose and remove material from the sample surface, allowing for real-time monitoring and analysis, thereby minimizing structural alteration and enabling precise imaging and analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical polishing or FIB milling is used to prepare sample surfaces, then material removal and surface smoothing are achieved, but structural alteration, charging effects, and distortion occur in novel multi-phase and multi-layered materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical polishing systems with an ion beam-based system that uses electromagnetic fields to accelerate ions for material removal. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact forces that cause structural distortion while achieving surface smoothing through controlled sputtering, directly resolving the contradiction between surface quality and structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs adjustable ion beam parameters including energy, current density, and incidence angle to optimize material removal rates while minimizing damage. By dynamically controlling these parameters, the system achieves smooth surfaces without the structural alteration and charging effects that plague conventional methods, thereby maintaining both surface precision and structural reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If FIB systems are used for precise site-specific sampling, then sub-surface features can be accessed, but the excavated area is very small and the process is time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesite-specific sampling accuracyVSAvoidmaterial removal rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the ion beam into multiple independent segments or columns that can be independently controlled and directed at different locations on the sample. This segmentation enables parallel processing of multiple regions, maintaining the precision of site-specific sampling while dramatically increasing overall material removal rate and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic ion beam system where the beam can be rapidly repositioned, focused, and defocused in response to real-time sample topology. This dynamic control allows the system to maintain high precision at targeted locations while efficiently removing material from surrounding areas, resolving the contradiction between sampling accuracy and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If mechanical polishing is used on softer materials, then surface smoothing is achieved, but the materials tend to smear or become delaminated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidmaterial morphology
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical polishing with ion beam sputtering, which removes material through atomic-level ejection rather than mechanical abrasion. This substitution eliminates the smearing and delamination effects caused by mechanical forces on soft materials, achieving surface smoothness while preserving the original material morphology

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If mechanical polishing is used on hard or brittle materials, then surface smoothing is achieved, but the materials may fracture or shed particles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface smoothnessVSAvoidparticle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical polishing with ion beam processing, which removes material through controlled sputtering without mechanical contact. This eliminates the fracturing and particle shedding inherent in mechanical methods, achieving smooth surfaces on hard and brittle materials without generating contaminating particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the precise preparation of planar surfaces within the vacuum chamber, enabling immediate verification and analysis, reducing oxidative artifacts, and facilitating simultaneous use of various analytical techniques, thus improving the accuracy and reliability of microscopic analysis.

Implementation Method 1

an excitation beam source that generates an excitation beam configured to remove material from a surface of the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSputtering: Sputtering

Implementation Method 2

an excitation beam source that generates an excitation beam configured to remove material from a surface of the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS8878147B2Method and apparatus for in situ preparation of serial planar surfaces for microscopy
Publication Date: 2014.11.04 ROBINSON JOSEPH C
  • US8878147B2 patent drawing
  • US8878147B2 patent drawing
  • US8878147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for preparing solid samples for analysis, such as microscopic examination in cross section or planimetric orientation. The sample preparation systems may include a sample support configured to secure a solid sample, an excitation beam source that generates an excitation beam configured to remove material from a surface of the sample, a beam shield configured to at least partially protect the sample from the excitation beam, and a beam shield holder configured to secure the beam shield, where the adjustment of the relative positions of the beam shield and sample holder permits the excitation beam to selectively expose a series of substantially planar surfaces of the sample.