In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Using Threshold Responses and KD

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining bioavailability and bioequivalence of drugs in vivo in humans are inadequate as they rely on peak plasma concentrations, which do not accurately reflect drug efficacy due to differences in metabolic patterns and transfer times to tissue sites.

Innovation Solution

Measure drug concentrations at receptor sites and responses to obtain intrinsic activities and dissociation constants (KD values) in vivo in humans, using a method that directly assesses drug effectiveness by measuring onset time, threshold doses, and intrinsic activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If plasma concentration measurements are used to estimate bioavailability, then the measurement process is simple and non-invasive, but the accuracy of bioavailability determination deteriorates because plasma concentrations do not accurately reflect drug efficacy at receptor sites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebioavailability determination accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses plasma concentration measurements as an intermediary to indirectly assess drug efficacy at receptor sites. By establishing mathematical relationships between plasma concentrations and receptor site concentrations, the method translates easily obtainable plasma data into meaningful efficacy parameters without directly measuring receptor interactions in vivo.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the measurement approach by changing from direct receptor site concentration measurement to plasma concentration measurement with mathematical correction. This parameter change allows use of simpler, non-invasive plasma sampling while maintaining accuracy through correction factors derived from pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If radio labelled drugs are used to determine in vivo binding parameters, then direct measurement of drug-receptor interaction is achieved, but the method becomes unsuitable for human studies due to radiation safety concerns and altered binding characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein vivo binding parameter accuracyVSAvoidradiation exposure and binding alteration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a mathematical model that copies the essential features of radio labelled drug binding behavior using non-radioactive drugs. By measuring plasma concentrations and applying pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, the method replicates the information obtained from radio labelled studies without the harmful effects of radiation or altered binding characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, hazardous radio labelled compounds with inexpensive, safe non-radioactive drugs. The method uses readily available clinical drug substances and eliminates the need for complex radiochemistry while providing equivalent or superior information for human studies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If in vitro KD values from cell cultures are used to predict in vivo drug behavior, then laboratory measurements are straightforward and controllable, but the values fail to predict actual in vivo efficacy due to metabolic and transfer time differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement easeVSAvoidin vivo prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a feedback loop between in vitro measurements and in vivo observations. By comparing predicted in vivo behavior from in vitro data with actual clinical outcomes, the method refines pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models to improve predictive accuracy while maintaining the simplicity of in vitro screening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses plasma concentration-time profiles as an intermediary to bridge in vitro and in vivo measurements. This intermediary allows translation of controlled laboratory data into clinically relevant predictions by accounting for metabolic processes and tissue transfer dynamics that occur in the living system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250241586A1Bioavailability and bioequivalence through intrinsic activity and KD measurements, in vivo, in humans
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 BANERJEE DEBASISH
  • US20250241586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250241586A1 patent drawing
  • US20250241586A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Bioequivalence and/or bioavailability data are mandatory for filing of NDA and ANDA. Presently in absence of proper procedures estimates of these data through peak plasma level concentrations and time to reach peak plasma levels are used. The method suffers from the serious drawback that peak plasma levels do not correlate with efficacy due to delay in transfer to tissue sites as well as differences in metabolic patterns in drugs. Here we have devised a novel method for determination of bioavailability and bioequivalence from measurement of threshold times and concentrations, intrinsic activity, and dissociation constants in vivo in humans. The method essentially determines Intrinsic activities and threshold doses through measurement of drug responses in humans and then uses a mathematical expression to determine KD values of drugs, in vivo, in humans. The process may be applied to animals as well. The method would go a long way in evaluation of true bioavailability and bioequivalence and would also be useful in design.