In-Wheel EV Lateral-Vertical Control Under Nonlinear Tire Loads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing in-wheel motor drive systems for electric vehicles face issues with unbalanced magnetic forces affecting ride comfort, tire-road contact, and handling stability due to unconsidered nonlinear tire characteristics and linear tire models, leading to poor control performance under extreme conditions.

Innovation Solution

A 14-DOF full-vehicle model is constructed, combined with a three-dimensional piecewise-affine tire model and hybrid model predictive control for active front-wheel steering, and a multi-constraint active suspension system to integrate lateral and vertical control, addressing unbalanced magnetic forces and nonlinear tire behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a linear tire model is used for lateral dynamics control, then the controller design is simplified, but the control accuracy deteriorates under nonlinear or saturated tire conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller design complexityVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tire model is segmented into multiple linear regions based on operating conditions (normal, saturated, extreme). Each region has its own linear parameters, allowing the controller to switch between different linear models depending on the current tire state, thus maintaining simplicity while improving accuracy across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tire model parameters are made dynamic rather than static. The controller continuously identifies the current operating region and adjusts the tire model parameters in real-time based on measured vehicle states and tire conditions, enabling the system to adapt to changing nonlinear characteristics without requiring a completely complex nonlinear model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If in-wheel motors are used to simplify vehicle structure and improve transmission efficiency, then the drive system complexity is reduced, but the lateral-vertical dynamic performance deteriorates due to increased unsprung mass and unbalanced magnetic forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive system structureVSAvoidlateral-vertical dynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control systems for lateral dynamics and vertical dynamics are merged into a single integrated control framework. The controller simultaneously considers both lateral stability (handling) and vertical performance (ride comfort, unbalanced magnetic force mitigation) by coordinating the control actions of the suspension system and steering system, thereby improving overall dynamic performance without adding physical complexity to the drive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring vehicle states (acceleration, orientation, tire forces) and adjusting the suspension and steering commands in real-time. This feedback mechanism compensates for the adverse effects of increased unsprung mass and unbalanced magnetic forces, maintaining stable lateral-vertical dynamics despite the simplified in-wheel motor drive structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If body roll is allowed under turning conditions, then the vehicle maintains natural handling characteristics, but the stator-rotor eccentricity increases, intensifying unbalanced magnetic forces and deteriorating lateral dynamic performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenatural handling characteristicsVSAvoidlateral dynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The controller applies preliminary anti-action by proactively counteracting the body roll that would naturally occur during turning. Before the roll becomes excessive and causes significant stator-rotor eccentricity, the active suspension system pre-adjusts the wheel positions and the steering system makes compensatory adjustments to maintain optimal motor alignment, thereby preventing the intensification of unbalanced magnetic forces while preserving natural handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20260091775A1Method and system for lateral-vertical collaborative control of distributed in-wheel motor drive electric vehicles
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 CHANGAN UNIV
  • US20260091775A1 patent drawing
  • US20260091775A1 patent drawing
  • US20260091775A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for lateral-vertical integrated control of a distributed in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle is provided, in which a fourteen-degree-of-freedom full-vehicle model is constructed based on an unbalanced magnetic force model of an in-wheel motor; a lateral force-tire slip angle-vertical load-based three-dimensional piecewise-affine tire model is constructed based on the fourteen-degree-of-freedom vehicle model in combination with a corrected Magic Formula tire model; an active front-wheel steering controller is established based on hybrid model predictive control using the three-dimensional piecewise-affine tire model; an active suspension system controller is established based on multi-constraint input and multi-constraint output; and an integrated control strategy for the active front-wheel steering controller and the active suspension system controller is established based on a front-wheel steering angle, a β-{dot over (β)} phase plane and a lateral load transfer rate. Related devices for implementing such method are also provided.