Inattention Determination Using Saccade Velocity Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inattention determining apparatuses for drivers are prone to incorrect detection of the driver's gaze direction due to erroneous detection of bright points, leading to inappropriate determination of inattention and delayed alarm timing.

Innovation Solution

An inattention determining apparatus that captures a driver's face image and detects their sight direction, measuring continuation time only when the gaze is within a predetermined inattention direction or changes at a speed higher than a saccade-based movement limit, and includes a face direction detection to verify the accuracy of gaze direction changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the sight direction detecting device detects the bright point position to determine the driver's gaze direction, then the inattention determination can be performed, but erroneous detection occurs when the driver momentarily looks in the wrong direction, causing the continuation time to be reset and delaying the alarm timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesight direction detection accuracyVSAvoidinattention determination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by introducing temporal and velocity dimensions to sight direction detection. It monitors the change speed of detected bright point positions and compares them against physiological limits of human eye movement (saccade speeds). When detection values exceed physiologically plausible speeds, the system dynamically adjusts by maintaining previous valid detection results, thereby filtering erroneous detections while preserving reliable inattention determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the continuation time is reset when the sight direction deviates from the inattention direction, then the system responds to actual gaze changes, but it also resets the timer due to erroneous detections, causing delayed alarm timing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm response speedVSAvoidalarm timing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the velocity of sight direction changes and using this information to control the continuation time measurement. The system provides feedback to the inattention determination logic, indicating whether a sight direction change is physiologically plausible. This feedback mechanism prevents false resets of the continuation timer, ensuring that alarm timing reflects actual driver behavior rather than detection errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses infrared light reflection to detect the driver's eyes, then it can operate in various lighting conditions, but bright points may be erroneously detected when the driver looks away, causing wrong sight direction determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation under various lighting conditionsVSAvoidgaze direction detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing velocity thresholds based on human physiological parameters (saccade speed limits) to the detection system. Instead of relying solely on spatial parameters (bright point position), the system incorporates temporal derivatives (speed of position change) as an additional parameter. This physiological parameter constraint filters out erroneous detections that violate human eye movement capabilities, while maintaining the infrared reflection method's adaptability to various lighting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures accurate determination of driver inattention by maintaining continuation time measurement despite erroneous gaze direction changes, improving the reliability of inattention detection and preventing unnecessary alarm timing delays.

Implementation Method 1

an infrared irradiator provided in the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfrared radiation: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

capturing an image of a bright point based on reflection of the infrared light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8767061B2Inattention determining apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.07.01 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US8767061B2 patent drawing
  • US8767061B2 patent drawing
  • US8767061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inattention determination device includes a sight direction detecting unit that detects a sight direction of a driver, and an inattention determining unit that measures an inattention continuation time from a time point when the sight direction is a predetermined inattention direction to a time point when the sight direction deviates from the predetermined inattention direction and becomes a direction other than the inattention direction and determines that the driver is inattentive when the intention continuation time is equal to or more than a predetermined time. The inattention determining unit maintains measurement of the inattention continuation time when the sight direction is changed at a speed higher than a predetermined movement speed from the predetermined inattention direction to a direction other than the inattention direction or when the sight direction is momentarily a direction other than the inattention direction.