Inboard Extended Column Semi-Submersible Hull Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semi-submersibles in the oil and gas industry face hydrodynamic performance issues due to the spacing between columns and pontoons, which affects metacentric height and increases the complexity, size, and weight of the topsides, limiting the hydrodynamic performance and increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates columns with a cross section featuring a rectangular first portion and an inboard-extending triangular second portion, allowing for wider pontoon spacing without increasing support point spacing, thereby improving hydrodynamic performance while reducing the size and weight of the topsides and maintaining stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the spacing between columns is reduced, then the metacentric height is reduced and topsides size/weight increase, but the pontoon spacing is reduced which negatively affects hydrodynamic performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetacentric heightVSAvoidhydrodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The column cross-section transitions from a conventional square shape to a pentagonal shape by adding a second triangular portion that extends inboard. This dimensional modification in the cross-sectional geometry allows the column to provide enhanced lateral support and stability without requiring reduced spacing between columns, thereby maintaining metacentric height while improving hydrodynamic performance through increased pontoon spacing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the spacing between sides of the pontoon is increased, then the hydrodynamic performance improves, but the spacing is limited by the column spacing which is constrained by topsides size, weight, and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrodynamic performanceVSAvoidtopsides weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By modifying the column cross-section to include an inboard-extending triangular portion, the design enables increased pontoon spacing without proportionally increasing topsides weight. The optimized geometry provides enhanced structural efficiency, allowing the hull to achieve improved hydrodynamic performance through wider pontoon spacing while the column configuration maintains adequate support with reduced material requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If the column cross section is modified to extend inboard, then the pontoon spacing can be widened without increasing support point spacing, but the column geometry becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepontoon spacingVSAvoidcolumn geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The column cross-section is segmented into distinct geometric portions: a first rectangular portion providing the primary structural framework and a second triangular portion extending inboard. This segmentation allows each portion to fulfill specific functional requirements - the rectangular portion maintains structural integrity while the triangular portion enables widened pontoon spacing - thereby achieving increased spacing without proportionally increasing overall column complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The column design merges the rectangular and triangular portions into a unified pentagonal cross-section that functions as an integrated structural element. This combination allows the column to simultaneously provide lateral support through the rectangular portion and enable widened pontoon spacing through the inboard-extending triangular portion, achieving multiple objectives within a single geometric form rather than requiring separate structural components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11059544B2Inboard extended column semi-submersible
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 SEATRIUM MARINE & DEEPWATER TECH PTE LTD
  • US11059544B2 patent drawing
  • US11059544B2 patent drawing
  • US11059544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure relate generally to apparatus for semi-submersibles, including hulls of semi-submersibles. In one implementation, a hull for a semi-submersible includes a pontoon having one or more sides, and a plurality of columns extending upwards from the pontoon and configured to support a topsides. Each one of the plurality of columns has a cross section that is in a plane perpendicular to an axial centerline of the respective one of the plurality of columns. The cross section includes a first portion being rectangular in shape and a second portion being triangular in shape and having an apex that extends inboard from the first portion.