Incident Analyzer Deduplication for Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In distributed processing systems, the sheer volume of error and status reports overwhelms systems administrators, making it difficult to handle and identify meaningful incidents due to the overwhelming number of reports, which become unhelpful and irrelevant.

Innovation Solution

An incident analyzer identifies attribute combination entries of location identifications and incident types, analyzes each location identification, and counts attribute pairs to determine the number of unique incidents, thereby filtering out irrelevant information and providing a manageable number of unique incidents for processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If all error and status reports are collected and presented to systems administrators, then complete information is available for analysis, but the sheer volume of reports becomes overwhelming and unmanageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidmanageability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential and unique incident information from the overwhelming volume of error and status reports. By identifying and extracting unique incidents based on specific criteria (error type, component, severity), the system presents only the most relevant information to administrators, filtering out redundant duplicate reports while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the large volume of incident reports into manageable categories and unique incident types. By organizing reports into distinct segments based on error characteristics and uniqueness criteria, the system makes the information structure manageable and analyzable without presenting the entire raw volume to administrators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If duplicate error reports are filtered out to reduce volume, then manageability improves, but potential loss of relevant incident details may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemanageabilityVSAvoidincident detail retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent carefully extracts only true duplicates for filtering while preserving unique incident details. By applying specific uniqueness criteria (error type, affected component, severity level), the system extracts and removes only identical duplicate reports, ensuring that no relevant incident details are lost in the deduplication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quality standards to different aspects of incident reports. Not all reports are treated uniformly - instead, each report is evaluated against specific local criteria (error type matching, component matching, severity matching) to determine uniqueness, allowing selective filtering that preserves important details while removing true duplicates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9389943B2Determining a number of unique incidents in a plurality of incidents for incident processing in a distributed processing system
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9389943B2 patent drawing
  • US9389943B2 patent drawing
  • US9389943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for determining a number of unique incidents in a plurality of incidents for incident processing in a distributed processing system are provided. Embodiments include an incident analyzer identifying within the plurality of incidents, attribute combination entries of location identifications and incident types and analyzing each location identification in each attribute combination entry according to a sequence of the attribute combination entries including creating attribute pairs. The incident analyzer is also configured to count the attribute pairs. The number of attribute pairs is the number of unique incidents in the plurality of incidents.