Security Incident Clustering for Automated Investigation Steps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current security incident investigations by human analysts are labor-intensive and require building context from scratch for each event, making it difficult and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

A computing device employs an incident clustering engine to group security incidents and runbooks into clusters based on investigation similarity, using a large language model to determine summaries and criteria, and a retrieval augmented generation pipeline to suggest investigation steps, with human approval and reinforcement learning for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human analysts manually investigate each security incident from scratch, then investigation accuracy can be maintained through domain knowledge, but investigation time and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigation accuracyVSAvoidinvestigation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-clustering security incidents and pre-generating investigation steps for each cluster before actual incidents occur. When a new incident is detected, the system quickly retrieves and presents pre-prepared investigation steps tailored to the incident's cluster, eliminating the need to build context from scratch while maintaining accuracy through domain-expert-curated procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and maintains a library of standardized investigation step templates for different incident clusters. These templates represent proven investigation procedures that can be copied and adapted to similar incidents, allowing analysts to leverage established methodologies rather than reinventing investigation approaches for each new incident.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If each security incident is handled as a singular event requiring full context building, then investigation thoroughness is maintained, but scalability of the investigation process deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigation thoroughnessVSAvoidinvestigation scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the investigation process into cluster-specific standardized steps and incident-specific customization opportunities. By dividing incidents into clusters with shared characteristics, the system can apply standardized investigation procedures to common incident types while retaining the ability to adapt to unique aspects of individual incidents, thereby improving scalability without sacrificing thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates universal investigation step templates that can serve multiple incident types within a cluster. These multi-functional templates are designed to handle various scenarios through parameterization and conditional logic, allowing a single set of investigation steps to address multiple similar incidents efficiently while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated systems are introduced to reduce manual effort, then investigation speed improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer consisting of pre-defined cluster definitions and investigation step templates that mediate between automated incident detection and analyst decision-making. This intermediary structure organizes complex automation logic into manageable, reusable components, making the system easier to maintain and extend while delivering automated speed benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing investigation steps rather than hard-coding complex decision logic. Investigation templates use parameters and variables that can be dynamically adjusted based on incident attributes, allowing the system to handle diverse incidents through configurable parameters rather than requiring complex proprietary algorithms for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250356005A1Technologies for automated predictive curation of contextualization steps for investigating a security incident
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 ARCTIC WOLF NETWORKS INC
  • US20250356005A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356005A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356005A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies for automated security incident analysis include a computing device that clusters security incidents and runbooks into multiple clusters based on investigation similarity. For each cluster, the computing device determines a summary of all security incidents in the cluster with a large language model, determines criteria for inclusion of a security incident in the cluster, and determines a suggested investigation step with a retrieval augmented generation pipeline. The suggested investigation step includes a natural language description and a programmatic query. Upon receiving approval from a user, the computing device stores the cluster information in a curated query repository. The computing device may receive a security incident for investigation, assign the security incident to a cluster based on the stored criteria, and retrieve a suggested investigation step from the curated query repository. The computing device may provide the suggested investigation step to a user. Other embodiments are described and claimed.