Incident Resource Management via Path Scenario Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing incident resource management systems face challenges in efficiently coordinating and dispatching appropriate resources to incidents based on the type, location, and time sensitivity of events, often resulting in delayed responses due to inadequate resource allocation and communication.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a communications network to acquire incident information, identify suitable mobile resources based on their capabilities and location, and assign them to incidents through generic path scenarios, ensuring timely and effective resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual resource identification and assignment methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but response time increases and resource allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies and pre-routes mobile resources to incidents before formal assignment occurs. Processing logic automatically determines generic path scenarios and prepares resource routing in advance, reducing the time from incident detection to resource deployment without requiring complex manual coordination procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Mobile resources autonomously receive and execute routing instructions from the system. The processing logic automatically assigns resources based on incident type and resource capability matching, eliminating the need for manual dispatcher intervention and reducing response time while maintaining manageable system complexity through automated decision rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive resource capability matching is implemented, then resource allocation accuracy improves, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system matches mobile resources to incidents based on specific capability requirements for each incident type. Processing logic evaluates resource capabilities against incident-specific criteria, ensuring accurate allocation without requiring comprehensive analysis of all possible resource attributes for every scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts resource assignment criteria based on incident characteristics. Processing logic modifies matching parameters according to incident type, location, and resource availability, achieving high allocation accuracy through adaptive parameter adjustment rather than fixed complex rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple mobile resources are identified and evaluated, then resource selection quality improves, but identification time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource selection qualityVSAvoididentification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies multiple candidate mobile resources and their generic path scenarios before final assignment. Processing logic evaluates multiple resources simultaneously based on capability matching and routing efficiency, preparing selection options in advance to ensure quality without extending identification time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies and evaluates a limited set of candidate resources that meet minimum capability thresholds for each incident type. Processing logic performs sufficient evaluation of multiple candidates to ensure quality selection without exhaustively analyzing all possible resources, achieving reliable assignment within acceptable time constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If automated message sending and assignment notification is implemented, then communication efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically sends assignment notifications and routing instructions to mobile resources without manual intervention. Processing logic generates and transmits communications based on assignment decisions, improving communication efficiency through automation while maintaining simple operational procedures for users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10740700B2Incident resource management
Publication Date: 2020.08.11 CONROY JOSEPH E
  • US10740700B2 patent drawing
  • US10740700B2 patent drawing
  • US10740700B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a system may comprise a communications network and processing logic. The processing logic may acquire information regarding an incident, identify a first mobile resource (MR) that may respond to the incident based on a type of the incident and a capability associated with the first MR. The processing logic may further identify a generic path scenario to the incident based on a location of the MR and a location of the incident. The processing logic may identify that the first MR is preferred over a second MR with respect to responding to the incident and assign the first MR to the incident. The processing logic may send a message via the communications network to the first MR to notify the first MR that it has been assigned to the incident.