Incident Similarity Detection Using Vectorized Record Indexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In big data environments, detecting and responding to incidents is challenging due to the complexity and scale of the systems, leading to delays in addressing issues that can cause downtime, compromised data integrity, and security breaches.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a vector database and a large language model (LLM) to index, vectorize, and analyze incident records, enabling the detection of similar incidents and providing remediation strategies based on similarity scores and textual explanations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional incident detection tools are used in big data environments, then incident detection capability is maintained, but response time is delayed due to the sheer volume and velocity of data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The incident detection system is segmented into multiple specialized components: vectorization module for converting incident attributes to vectors, similarity computation module for calculating distances between incident vectors, and incident record generation module for creating structured records. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks efficiently, reducing overall response time despite system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A vector database serves as an intermediary between raw incident data and analysis operations. Incident records are converted to vector representations and stored in the vector database, enabling efficient similarity searches without repeatedly processing raw data. This intermediary structure accelerates incident response by providing quick access to comparable incident patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the volume of incident records increases to cover more system components, then detection coverage is improved, but the time to analyze and prioritize incidents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidincident analysis speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms incident records from structured data into vector representations, changing the parameter space from discrete attributes to continuous vector space. This parameter transformation enables the use of distance-based similarity metrics, allowing rapid comparison across large volumes of incident records while maintaining comprehensive detection coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of analyzing raw incident records directly, the system creates vector copies of incident attributes and stores them in the vector database. These vector copies preserve the essential characteristics of incidents while enabling efficient similarity computations, thus maintaining detection coverage while improving analysis speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If manual incident response processes are used, then response accuracy is maintained, but response time increases leading to increased downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidsimilarity detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual incident analysis with automated vector-based similarity computation. The vectorization process and distance calculations are performed automatically by the system, eliminating manual review while maintaining detection accuracy through mathematical similarity metrics that objectively compare incident patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive incident attributes are collected to improve incident understanding, then detection accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts essential attributes from comprehensive incident data and represents them as vectors in a reduced-dimensional space. This extraction process retains the most discriminative features needed for accurate detection while eliminating redundant information, thus maintaining detection accuracy while reducing processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12511297B2Techniques for detecting similar incidents
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 BIGPANDA INC
  • US12511297B2 patent drawing
  • US12511297B2 patent drawing
  • US12511297B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for detecting similar incident records for initiating remediation actions in a computing environment is provided. The method includes: receiving a plurality of incident records, each incident record generated based on extracted values from a plurality of event records; generating an indexed incident record based on a plurality of predetermined categorical attributes; vectorizing a string of categorical attributes to generate a vectorized indexed incident record; storing the vectorized indexed incident record in a vector database; vectorizing a new incident record; querying the vector database based on the vectorized new incident record to detect a similar vector; and generating a similar incident record based on the detected similar vector.