Electronic Device Incident Validation and Similarity Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in determining the validity of reported incidents and efficiently providing appropriate response measures to on-site managers, often leading to inappropriate handling due to time delays and false reports.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device and method that receive new incident information and reporter data, determine the validity of the report, and if true, compare it to past incident data to find similar incidents, providing relevant response information based on regulation updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If incident response measures are found based on reported incident information, then on-site managers can make decisions, but time delays occur and false reports cause inappropriate handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response accuracyVSAvoidtime to find response measure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of incident reports by comparing reported incidents against historical incident patterns and false report indicators before generating response measures. This preliminary action filters out false reports early in the process, preventing wasted time on inappropriate responses while maintaining quick access to valid incidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer between incident reporting and response generation. This intermediary component analyzes report characteristics, compares with historical data, and determines report validity before proceeding to find response measures, thus resolving the contradiction between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If similar incident information is provided based on text comparison, then response accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident similarity measurementVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms unstructured incident text into structured parameters and features that can be efficiently compared. By changing the representation parameters of incident data (e.g., extracting key entities, locations, times), the system achieves precise similarity measurement without requiring complex full-text comparison algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The incident comparison process is segmented into distinct stages: text preprocessing, feature extraction, similarity calculation, and result ranking. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If false reports are filtered using deep learning models, then report validity determination improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse report detection accuracyVSAvoidreport processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies deep learning-based false report detection selectively to reports that exhibit certain risk indicators or ambiguous characteristics, rather than processing all reports equally. This partial application of complex analysis maintains high detection accuracy for problematic reports while preserving fast processing for clearly valid incidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from historical validation results to continuously improve false report detection. By learning from past cases where reports were confirmed as false or valid, the system refines its detection algorithms over time, improving accuracy without requiring increasingly complex processing for each new report.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250156977A1Electronic device for providing similar incident information about reported incident and operating method of electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US20250156977A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156977A1 patent drawing
  • US20250156977A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are an electronic device for providing similar incident information about a reported incident and an operating method of the electronic device, in which the operating method includes receiving new incident information and reporter information about a reported new incident, determining whether the new incident information is obtained by a false or mistaken report, based on the new incident information and the reporter information, determining, when the new incident information is determined to be true, a similarity with one or more pieces of related incident information associated with the reported new incident in a database that stores past incident information, and outputting, among the one or more pieces of related incident information, similar incident information to respond to the reported new incident, based on the similarity.