Incised Unidirectional Prepreg for 3D Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fiber reinforced plastic materials face challenges in shaping complex forms due to difficulties in flowability and uniformity, particularly when molding into three-dimensional shapes with convex/concave portions, leading to defective moldings and compromised mechanical properties.

Innovation Solution

A laminated base material comprising layers of incised prepreg with unidirectionally oriented reinforcement fibers and additional base plies with varying fiber lengths and orientations, optimized for fiber volume fraction and incision patterns to enhance flowability and shape conformity in both in-plane and out-of-plane directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If continuous fiber prepregs are used to maintain high mechanical properties, then strength is improved, but difficulty in shaping into three-dimensional or complicated shapes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidshaping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous reinforcement fibers are divided into discontinuous segments through incisions made at specific angles (1° to 45°) relative to the fiber direction. This segmentation allows the fiber bundles to flow and conform to three-dimensional shapes while maintaining sufficient length (10mm to 300mm) to preserve mechanical reinforcement. The incised prepreg structure enables both complex shaping and adequate mechanical properties by creating controlled fiber discontinuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If incisions are made in prepregs to enable three-dimensional shaping, then shape conformity is improved, but incision enlargement during extension occurs leading to deteriorated mechanical properties and surface quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-dimensional shape conformityVSAvoidsurface quality and mechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The incision angle parameter is precisely controlled within 1° to 45° relative to the fiber direction to prevent excessive incision enlargement during extension. The fiber length after incision is optimized to 10mm to 300mm to balance flowability and mechanical reinforcement. These parameter optimizations ensure that incisions do not enlarge excessively during molding, preventing resin pooling and maintaining surface quality while enabling three-dimensional shaping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If lamination base materials are used for complex shapes with convex/concave portions, then shape diversity is improved, but flowability is hindered near rising faces leading to defective moldings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape diversityVSAvoidflowability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The lamination base material is segmented into multiple layers with different fiber orientations and properties. The first lamination base material contains incised prepregs optimized for flowability, while the second contains materials optimized for mechanical properties. This layered segmentation allows different regions of the complex mold to be filled appropriately, with flowable materials reaching convex/concave portions and rising faces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the lamination base material are assigned different properties: the first lamination base material (with incised prepregs) provides enhanced flowability for difficult-to-reach areas, while the second lamination base material provides structural reinforcement. This local quality differentiation ensures optimal performance in both flowable and structurally critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple lamination base materials are stacked to achieve good moldings in complex shapes, then molding quality is improved, but production complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding qualityVSAvoidproduction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The production process is segmented into distinct steps: preparing incised prepregs with specific fiber orientations, stacking them in predetermined sequences with other lamination base materials, and molding the composite stack. This segmentation of the production process into standardized, repeatable steps manages complexity while achieving high molding quality through controlled material architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11279097B2Laminated base material and method of manufacturing fiber-reinforced plastic
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 TORAY INDUSTRIES INC
  • US11279097B2 patent drawing
  • US11279097B2 patent drawing
  • US11279097B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A substantially flat-plate-shaped laminated base material has at least a layer-shaped body α and a layer-shaped body β are layered or disposed side by side, the layer-shaped body α having one or more cut prepregs A in which reinforcing fibers oriented in one direction are impregnated with a resin composition, the volume fraction of fiber is 45-65%, and at least a portion of the reinforcing fibers are segmented into a fiber length of 10-300 mm by a plurality of cuts, and the layer-shaped body β having one or more base materials B in which reinforcing fibers having a fiber length in the range of 10-300 mm are impregnated with a resin composition.