Surgical Incision Closure Structure for Uniform Tissue Approximation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surgical incision closure devices fail to evenly bring tissue edges together, lack adjustability for closure force and distance, and are prone to displacement under surgical drapes, leading to increased scarring and procedural interference.

Innovation Solution

The incision closure device features a base with adhesive panels and a force distribution structure that allows axial expansion while limiting lateral expansion, coupled with a closure component to uniformly draw tissue edges together, and includes a sacrificial layer to prevent displacement under surgical drapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the closure device is made rigid to securely close the tissue, then the closure strength is improved, but the device cannot conform to tissue movement during the surgical procedure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure strengthVSAvoidconformability to tissue movement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device incorporates a dynamic structure that allows it to adapt between rigid and flexible states. The device includes a base with panels that can move relative to each other, enabling the rigid portions to provide closure strength while the flexible connections allow conformation to tissue movement during surgery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The closure device uses flexible panels and thin film structures that can conform to tissue contours and movement. These flexible elements are strategically placed to allow tissue deformation during surgery while maintaining overall closure integrity and providing uniform closure forces when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Reliability

If the surgical incision drape adheres to the tissue closure patch, then sterility is maintained, but the closure patch is removed or displaced during drape removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesterility maintenanceVSAvoidclosure patch positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device is segmented into distinct functional layers: a sterile barrier layer that interfaces with the drape and a tissue interface layer that remains attached to the tissue. This segmentation allows the drape to adhere to the sterile barrier without displacing the tissue closure function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sacrificial intermediate layer or protective covering is introduced between the drape and the closure patch. This intermediary layer allows the drape to adhere and be removed cleanly without transferring adhesive forces to the closure patch, preventing displacement while maintaining sterility during the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the tissue edges are not brought together evenly, then the closure speed is improved, but scarring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosure speedVSAvoidscarring
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device provides dynamically adjustable closure forces through its mechanical structure. The device can be engaged at different stages of tissue approximation, allowing rapid initial closure followed by gradual refinement to achieve even tissue edge alignment, minimizing scarring while maintaining efficient closure speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device enables control of closure parameters such as force magnitude and distribution. By adjusting these parameters, the device achieves both rapid closure and even tissue edge approximation, preventing the formation of uneven scars while maintaining high closure efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device minimizes scarring by evenly distributing closure forces, conforms to tissue deformation, and remains in place during surgical procedures, reducing procedural interference and scarring.

Implementation Method 1

a lower adhesive layer comprising a first elasticity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

a middle layer coupled to and cover at least a portion of the flexible adhesive layer and have a second elasticity less than the first elasticity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3574848B1Surgical incision and closure apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.05.13 STRYKER CORP
  • EP3574848B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3574848B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3574848B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An apparatus for closing a surgical incision comprises left and right base panels, a plurality of closure components, and a plurality of left and right axial supports coupled to the respective base panels. The closure components couple the left and right base panels to each other laterally and have left and right ends coupled to the respective base panels. The closure components are positioned laterally across the left and right panels, the left axial supports are disposed between pairs of left closure component ends, the right axial supports are disposed between pairs of right closure component ends, and the left and right axial supports are offset from one another such that a serpentine arrangement of consecutive closure components and axial supports is formed. The apparatus can be made of antimicrobial materials or materials impregnated with antimicrobial agents. A flexible adhesive cover can be provided over the apparatus when in use.