Inclined Blade Guard Pole Layout to Reduce Uncut Plants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guard mechanisms for rotary blades in work machines, such as lawn mowers, cause uncut plant parts due to parallel arrangement of guard portions, leading to inefficiencies in cutting plants while maintaining safety.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a guard pole portion with an inclined design relative to the machine's longitudinal direction, which includes inclined portions on guard poles to allow plants to rise after being pushed down, reducing uncut parts and enhancing cutting efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If guard portions are arranged in a direction parallel to the machine body longitudinal direction, then work safety is maintained, but uncut plant parts occur due to plants being stepped on by the guard portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework safetyVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The guard pole portion is designed with an inclined shape rather than a parallel arrangement, creating asymmetric geometry that allows plants to rise after being pushed down. The inclined portion extends in an oblique direction relative to the machine body longitudinal direction, preventing plants from being continuously stepped on while maintaining the guard's safety function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The guard pole portion is extended in an oblique direction that combines both longitudinal and lateral dimensions. This dimensional change allows the guard to push plants down initially but then permit them to rise as the inclined surface transitions, resolving the contradiction between safety coverage and cutting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If guard portions are arranged parallel to the machine body longitudinal direction, then structural simplicity is maintained, but cutting efficiency deteriorates due to uncut parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguard structure simplicityVSAvoidcutting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The guard pole portion adopts an asymmetric inclined design where the extension direction varies along its length. This asymmetric geometry provides cutting efficiency improvement without requiring complex multi-component structures, as it is implemented as a single inclined portion on the guard pole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Productivity

If the guard pole portion is designed with an inclined portion extending in an oblique direction, then cutting efficiency is improved by allowing plants to rise, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidguard pole structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Only the necessary portion of the guard pole is designed with an inclined shape - specifically the guard pole portion that contacts the plants. The rest of the guard structure can maintain simpler geometry, localizing the complexity only where it provides functional benefit for plant clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12582032B2Work machine
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12582032B2 patent drawing
  • US12582032B2 patent drawing
  • US12582032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A work machine comprising: a blade; a blade housing; and a guard pole portion provided below the blade, wherein the guard pole portion is supported by the blade housing, and the guard pole portion includes an inclined portion extending in an oblique direction with respect to a machine body longitudinal direction of the work machine.