Income Itemization via Financial Institution Data Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining income tax liability for income payments received through direct deposit is burdensome, complex, and time-consuming due to varying tax rates across states, cities, and counties, and the need to identify the location of work and type of work associated with the payment.

Innovation Solution

A system where financial institutions use information provided with direct deposits to determine state, city, and county income tax liability, providing income itemization and tax liability information to users via a computing device, allowing users to revise this information and using data extraction and processing software to categorize and summarize income tax obligations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual determination of income tax liability is performed, then accuracy of tax calculation is improved, but time consumption and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tax calculationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting work location information, income payment details, and jurisdictional tax rate data before tax calculation is needed. This pre-gathering of information eliminates the need for manual data collection during tax determination, reducing time consumption while maintaining accuracy through systematic data acquisition from multiple sources including employers and financial institutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that acts as a mediator between various data sources (employers, financial institutions, tax authorities) and the user. This intermediary automatically retrieves and processes work location information, income details, and tax rates, eliminating the need for users to manually gather and cross-reference multiple pieces of information while ensuring accurate tax calculation through systematic data integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive income itemization is provided, then user understanding of tax liability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser understanding of tax liabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments comprehensive tax information into distinct, manageable components including work location details, income payment breakdowns, applicable tax rates by jurisdiction, and calculated tax liability. This segmentation presents complex tax data in an organized, easy-to-understand format for users while the system handles the complexity of integrating multiple data sources and calculation rules behind the scenes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing customized tax information tailored to each user's specific situation, including only the jurisdictions and tax rates relevant to their work locations and income sources. This approach delivers comprehensive information necessary for understanding tax liability while avoiding unnecessary complexity by excluding irrelevant jurisdictions and data points for each individual user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If automated data collection is implemented, then time required for tax determination is reduced, but information security requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of tax determinationVSAvoidinformation security risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs secure intermediary mechanisms that act as trusted intermediaries between data sources and users during automated data collection. These intermediaries implement encryption, authentication, and authorized access controls to protect sensitive work location and income information during transmission and storage, enabling fast automated collection while mitigating security risks through layered protection mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming sensitive data into protected formats during collection and processing, including encryption of personal information, masking of sensitive identifiers, and secure hashing of tax-related data. These parameter transformations maintain the utility of data for tax calculation purposes while reducing security risks by making raw sensitive information inaccessible even if intercepted or improperly accessed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8719122B1Income itemization
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US8719122B1 patent drawing
  • US8719122B1 patent drawing
  • US8719122B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Information provided with a direct deposit, a deposited check, or other negotiable instrument may be used to determine state, city, county, and/or other local income tax liability. Based on information associated with the deposit, the financial institution may determine where a user performed the work that triggered the income payment, where the income payment took place, what type of work is associated with the income payment, etc. This information may be used by the financial institution to provide income itemization and income tax liability information to the user via a user computing device.