Incremental PCP for Real-Time Video Background Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video background modeling methods, such as Principal Component Pursuit (PCP), face challenges including high computational cost, batch processing, and sensitivity to camera jitter, which hinder real-time processing and efficiency in handling streaming video.

Innovation Solution

The incremental Principal Component Pursuit (PCP) method processes video frames one at a time, utilizing alternating minimization and rank-1 modifications for thin Singular Value Decomposition, reducing memory footprint and computational complexity, and is robust to both translational and rotational jitter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If batch PCP methods are used for video background modeling, then accuracy is improved, but computational cost and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground modeling accuracyVSAvoidreal-time processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the batch processing problem into incremental updates. Instead of processing all frames simultaneously, the algorithm segments the computation into individual frame updates, allowing real-time processing while maintaining accuracy through sequential refinement of the background model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the static batch processing approach into a dynamic incremental algorithm. The background model is continuously updated as new frames arrive, allowing the system to adapt to changes in real-time while maintaining computational efficiency through optimized update mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If batch PCP methods are used, then modeling quality is improved, but memory footprint increases due to storing all frames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackground modeling qualityVSAvoidmemory footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for background modeling from each frame, rather than storing complete frame data. By extracting and processing only the necessary features and updates, the algorithm maintains modeling quality while significantly reducing memory requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial processing to each frame, focusing computational resources on the most significant changes and updates. This selective processing approach maintains background modeling quality by concentrating on critical information while avoiding unnecessary computation and memory usage on less important data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If online subspace tracking methods like GRASTA are used, then processing speed is improved, but initialization complexity and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidinitialization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary initialization using a simplified approach that requires minimal computation. By establishing a basic background model quickly in the initialization phase, the algorithm avoids the complex initialization procedures of other online methods, enabling faster startup while maintaining processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a lightweight initialization procedure that consumes minimal computational resources. The initialization phase employs simplified calculations and temporary data structures that are discarded after use, avoiding the high computational cost and complexity of more robust initialization methods while still enabling effective real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Productivity

If incremental methods are used, then real-time processing is enabled, but robustness to camera jitter deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time processing capabilityVSAvoidrobustness to camera jitter
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor frame consistency and detect jitter conditions. When jitter is detected, the algorithm adjusts its update strategy to maintain robustness, allowing real-time processing to continue while compensating for camera instability through adaptive feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes processing parameters based on detected camera stability. When jitter is detected, the algorithm adjusts parameters such as update frequency and threshold values to maintain reliability. This adaptive parameter adjustment enables the incremental method to remain robust to camera jitter while preserving real-time processing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9595112B2Incremental principal component pursuit for video background modeling
Publication Date: 2017.03.14 TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY LLC
  • US9595112B2 patent drawing
  • US9595112B2 patent drawing
  • US9595112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An incremental Principal Component Pursuit (PCP) algorithm for video background modeling that is able to process one frame at a time while adapting to changes in background, with a computational complexity that allows for real-time processing, having a low memory footprint and is robust to translational and rotational jitter.