Incremental Register Checkpointing for Transactional Memory

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hardware approaches to register checkpointing in speculative mechanisms are inefficient, requiring significant resources and complexity, while software-based methods are too slow for low-latency applications, especially for short transactions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing incremental register checkpointing, where only modified registers are checkpointed during transactions, using a combination of hardware and software mechanisms to track and restore register values, allowing for flexible and efficient checkpointing and restoration operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If all processor registers are checkpointed at the beginning of every transaction using hardware, then checkpoint and restore operations are very fast (single cycle), but the overhead and resource consumption are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckpoint speedVSAvoidcheckpoint overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the register checkpointing process into segments: only the subset of registers that are actually modified during a transaction are checkpointed, rather than all registers. This is achieved by tracking which registers are written to during transaction execution and checkpointing only those specific registers, thereby reducing the overhead while maintaining fast checkpoint/restore capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by checkpointing only the necessary portion of registers (those that are modified) rather than performing a complete checkpoint of all registers. This partial checkpointing approach reduces the energy overhead and resource consumption while still providing the required fault tolerance and transactional memory functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Speed

If all processor registers are checkpointed at the beginning of every transaction using hardware, then checkpoint and restore operations are very fast (single cycle), but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestore speedVSAvoidcheckpointing hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the checkpointing hardware to handle only modified registers. Instead of a monolithic checkpointing system that handles all registers, the hardware is designed to identify and checkpoint only the specific registers that are written to during transaction execution, reducing overall hardware complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary mechanisms (such as tracking structures and control logic) that mediate between the register file and the checkpointing hardware. These intermediaries enable the system to identify which registers need checkpointing without requiring complex hardwired logic for every possible register combination, thereby managing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If software is used to checkpoint registers in memory, then no special hardware support is required, but the latency is prohibitively slow for short transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware requirementsVSAvoidtransaction latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the checkpointing operation to handle only modified registers in hardware, which significantly reduces the time required compared to software-based checkpointing of all registers. This selective hardware checkpointing maintains low latency for short transactions while eliminating the need for complete software-based checkpointing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the software-based checkpointing mechanism (which is slow but requires no special hardware) with a hardware-based mechanism that selectively checkpoints only modified registers. This substitution of mechanical/software system with a targeted hardware system achieves both low latency and reduced hardware requirements compared to full hardware checkpointing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8560816B2System and method for performing incremental register checkpointing in transactional memory
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US8560816B2 patent drawing
  • US8560816B2 patent drawing
  • US8560816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods described herein for performing incremental register checkpointing may employ a special register to indicate which registers have already been checkpointed. This register may include one bit per register. These systems may also include a special pointer register whose value identifies a location in user memory or in dedicated on-chip storage at which a copy of a register's value should be saved by a checkpointing operation. Only registers modified during speculative execution or execution of a transaction may be checkpointed (e.g., when register modifying instructions are encountered) and subsequently restored (e.g., due to misspeculation or transaction abort), rather than all of the registers of the processor. Each register may be checkpointed at most once for a given speculative episode or atomic transaction. Setting a bit in the special register may prevent checkpointing of the corresponding register. Setting all of the bits in the special register may disable checkpointing.