Incremental Settlement Algorithm for Tri-Party Repo Collateral Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the context of Tri-Party Repo agreements, there is a risk exposure for clearinghouses due to the time gap between unwinding existing trades and settling new trades, as they provide liquidity and manage collateral, which can lead to financial exposure during this transitional period.

Innovation Solution

A settlement algorithm that optimizes the repurchase of collateral by using settled funds from new trades, leveraging RVP/DVP models for incremental settlements, and prioritizing asset quality to minimize the financial exposure of the clearinghouse by reducing large, time-consuming movements of securities, instead opting for smaller, individual transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If large, time-consuming movements of securities are used to manage collateral between trades, then the clearinghouse can provide liquidity and manage collateral, but financial exposure increases during the transitional period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollateral management capabilityVSAvoidfinancial exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the collateral management process into multiple incremental settlement steps (RVP/DVP models) rather than executing large, single transactions. This allows the clearinghouse to manage collateral in smaller, controlled portions, reducing the time and financial exposure associated with each transition while maintaining adaptability in handling diverse collateral requirements across multiple trades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If incremental settlements using RVP/DVP models are implemented, then settlement efficiency improves and financial exposure is reduced, but the complexity of the settlement algorithm increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettlement efficiencyVSAvoidsettlement algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary settlement algorithm that acts as a mediator between the clearinghouse and multiple trades. This algorithm automatically executes the complex RVP/DVP incremental settlement logic, coordinating collateral movements and cash flows across multiple transactions. By delegating the complexity to this intermediary system, the patent achieves high settlement efficiency while managing algorithmic complexity through automated, rule-based processing rather than manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the time gap between trade unwinding and reallocation is reduced, then financial exposure is minimized, but the precision and coordination required in settlement timing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial exposure minimizationVSAvoidsettlement timing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-coordinating settlement instructions and collateral movements before the actual trade unwinding and reallocation occurs. The settlement algorithm prepares and queues incremental settlement steps in advance, ensuring that collateral and cash flows are synchronized across multiple trades. This preliminary coordination reduces the time gap between unwinding and reallocation while managing timing precision through pre-planned, automated settlement sequences rather than reactive adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12259908B2Multi-modal-based generation of data synchronization instructions
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
  • US12259908B2 patent drawing
  • US12259908B2 patent drawing
  • US12259908B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In certain embodiments, multi-modal-based generation of settlement instructions may be facilitated. In some embodiments, a portfolio of a live environment may be emulated in a projected environment. A target portfolio may be generated in the projected environment based on the emulated portfolio. Partial synchronization between the target portfolio of the projected environment and the portfolio of the live environment may be performed such that a first subset of changes to the portfolio of the live environment are reflected in the target portfolio of the projected environment. Subsequent to the partial synchronization, the target portfolio of the projected environment may be updated such that the update of the target portfolio accounts for the first subset of changes. Subsequent to the update of the target portfolio, settlement instructions may be generated based on differences between the target portfolio of the projected environment and the portfolio of the live environment.