One-Pot Indacaterol Synthesis via Merging Steps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current synthesis methods for indacaterol intermediates, such as 4,5-diethyl-1H-inden-2-yl-amine, are complex, require multiple isolation and purification steps, leading to yield loss and increased costs, especially in industrial production, due to the need for multiple reaction steps and expensive starting materials.

Innovation Solution

A simplified synthesis process starting from indanol, involving a series of Friedel-Crafts reactions and reduction steps, allows for the preparation of 4,5-diethyl-1H-inden-2-yl-amine or its N-derivatives without the need for isolating intermediate compounds, using acetyl chloride and Lewis acid in a one-pot reaction, and reducing solvent volume to minimize isomer formation and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple isolation and purification steps are performed for each reaction intermediate, then the purity of intermediates is improved, but the yield is reduced and the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of intermediatesVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple reaction steps into a one-pot multi-component reaction where indanol, acetyl chloride, and benzylamine react simultaneously in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst. This merging of steps eliminates the need for isolating and purifying intermediate compounds, thereby maintaining high yield while achieving the desired product with sufficient purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction proceeds continuously in a single operation without interruption for isolation and purification. The multi-component reaction allows the transformation to proceed through multiple stages (protection, Friedel-Crafts acylation, deprotection, and nucleophilic substitution) in an uninterrupted sequence, maintaining reaction momentum and minimizing yield loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple reaction steps are performed with isolation and purification, then the purity of the final product is improved, but the production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurity of final productVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges protection, acylation, deprotection, and substitution steps into a single one-pot reaction sequence. This eliminates multiple isolation and purification operations, significantly reducing production time while still delivering the desired product with adequate purity for pharmaceutical applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction conditions are designed so that the protection group (acetyl) is installed and the Friedel-Crafts acylation occurs first, creating a reactive intermediate that automatically undergoes deprotection and subsequent nucleophilic substitution by benzylamine in the same reaction medium, eliminating the need for separate preparative steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If conventional synthesis methods are used starting from protected indanamine, then the reaction pathway is well-established, but the process complexity and cost increase due to multiple steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction pathway reliabilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of starting with protected indanamine and performing sequential transformations, the patent inverts the approach by starting with unprotected indanol and performing all transformations in one pot. This inversion simplifies the process by eliminating the need for protective group chemistry and multiple isolation steps, reducing overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters by using a Lewis acid catalyst system that enables all transformations to occur under the same conditions in a single reaction vessel. This parameter change (using Lewis acid catalysis) allows the multi-component reaction to proceed reliably without requiring the complex sequential processing of conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If expensive starting materials like diethylbenzene are used, then the reaction can proceed, but the production cost increases and yields are very low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction feasibilityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses inexpensive, readily available starting materials (indanol, acetyl chloride, benzylamine) instead of expensive diethylbenzene. The simple molecular structures of these reagents make them cost-effective while the one-pot reaction design ensures high efficiency and minimal waste, making the process economically viable for industrial production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases yields, reduces the formation of undesired isomers, and lowers production costs by eliminating the need for intermediate isolation and using less solvent, making the process more economically viable for industrial production.

Implementation Method 1

protecting the hydroxy of the compound of formula (II) to obtain the compound of formula (III)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEsterification: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

carrying out a Friedel Crafts reaction on the compound of formula (III) to obtain the compound of formula (IV)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriedel-Crafts reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

reducing the compound of formula (IV) to obtain the compound of formula (V)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 4

deprotecting the hydroxy of the compound of formula (VII) to obtain the compound of formula (VIII)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

reacting the compound of formula (XI) with a compound of formula R-NH2 to obtain the compound of formula (I)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleophilic substitution: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3247693B1Process for the preparation of indanamine derivatives and new synthesis intermediates
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 OLON SPA
  • EP3247693B1 patent drawing
  • EP3247693B1 patent drawing
  • EP3247693B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Subject-matter of the invention is a process for the preparation of a key intermediate in the synthesis of indacaterol. Subject-matter of the invention are also new synthesis intermediates. Formula (I):