Indentation Detection for Automotive Door Panel Bead Penetration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In automotive manufacturing, determining the quality and quantity of bead penetration between door panels is challenging due to non-uniform bead distribution, which affects the cohesion and consistency of the joint.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for analyzing imaging data from door panels to measure and quantify indentations formed by beads, using a visual analytics component to identify and store size data of indentations meeting a minimum size threshold, allowing for qualitative and quantitative assessment of bead penetration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bead penetration is measured to ensure proper panel joining, then joint quality and cohesion are improved, but measurement precision is degraded due to non-uniform bead distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint qualityVSAvoidbead penetration measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the panel surface into multiple regions and analyzes bead penetration separately in each region. This segmentation allows for localized quality assessment, accounting for non-uniform bead distribution while maintaining overall joint quality control. Each region's penetration characteristics are measured and evaluated independently, then aggregated to determine overall joint reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different measurement criteria and thresholds to different regions of the panel based on local bead distribution patterns. Rather than using a single uniform measurement standard, the system adapts measurement parameters to local conditions, improving measurement precision in areas with varying bead concentrations while ensuring overall joint quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the number of indentations is increased to improve bead distribution, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional imaging and analysis requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebead distribution uniformityVSAvoidimaging and analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with optical imaging and computer vision algorithms. Instead of using physical probes or contact-based measurement devices to assess bead penetration, the system uses image capture devices and automated image processing to detect and analyze indentation patterns, significantly reducing mechanical complexity while improving measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates digital copies (images) of the panel surface with bead indentations, allowing for non-contact analysis. The imaging system captures visual representations of the indentation patterns, and software algorithms process these copies to determine bead distribution characteristics, eliminating the need for complex physical measurement apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If detailed imaging data is collected for each indentation, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindentation size measurementVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of imaging data by capturing images with optimized parameters and pre-processing steps that enhance relevant features while reducing noise. Image filtering, contrast enhancement, and feature detection are performed in advance to prepare the data for faster analysis, reducing the time required for detailed indentation measurement while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a multi-level analysis approach where not all indentations are analyzed with the same level of detail. Critical indentations that affect joint quality are analyzed in full detail, while less critical areas use simplified analysis methods. This selective approach maintains measurement precision for important features while reducing overall processing time through partial analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10339647B2Methods, systems, and media for qualitative and/or quantitative indentation detection
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US10339647B2 patent drawing
  • US10339647B2 patent drawing
  • US10339647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for qualitative and/or quantitative indentation detection are provided. A method includes receiving imaging data comprising a plurality of indentations within a region on a surface. The method further includes obtaining a size measurement for each indentation. The method further includes calculating a number of indentations within the region are equal to or above a minimum size.