Independent Axle Steering Control for Cross-Track Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural machines face challenges in correcting cross-track and track-angle errors while minimizing vehicle rotation, leading to inefficiencies, implement damage, and resource waste due to complex steering algorithms and mode transitions that require different tuning parameters.

Innovation Solution

A steering controller that independently steers each axle of an agricultural machine using shared tuning parameters, converting input errors into a common unit, and dynamically switching between steering modes without separate parameter sets, thereby stabilizing the steering process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If four-wheel steering is implemented to improve maneuverability, then turning capability is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning capabilityVSAvoidsteering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic steering system where the front and rear wheels can be steered at different angles based on vehicle speed and turning conditions. The steering system transitions between four-wheel steering mode at low speeds for enhanced maneuverability and two-wheel steering mode at high speeds for stability, making the system adaptable rather than statically complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The steering system serves multiple functions: it provides four-wheel steering for tight maneuvers, two-wheel steering for high-speed stability, and automatic mode switching based on driving conditions. This multi-functionality justifies the increased complexity by delivering superior performance across diverse operating scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If rear wheel steering is added to improve parking capability, then low-speed maneuverability is enhanced, but mechanical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking capabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system is segmented into independent front and rear wheel steering mechanisms, allowing each axle to be controlled separately. This segmentation enables the rear wheels to be steered independently for parking maneuvers while the front wheels handle directional control, reducing the mechanical complexity compared to a fully integrated four-wheel steering system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If active front and rear suspension is implemented to improve ride quality, then comfort is enhanced, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveride qualityVSAvoidsuspension system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The active suspension system incorporates sensors and control mechanisms that continuously monitor road conditions and vehicle dynamics, automatically adjusting damping forces in real-time. This feedback-based approach enhances ride quality by adapting to varying conditions without requiring overly complex mechanical structures, as the intelligence is distributed through electronic control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Use of energy by moving object

If regenerative braking system is added to improve energy efficiency, then fuel economy is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economyVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The regenerative braking system merges the traditional friction braking mechanism with an electric regenerative braking system. The friction brakes provide reliable stopping power while the regenerative system recovers energy during deceleration. This combination achieves energy efficiency improvements without requiring a complete replacement of the braking system, thereby limiting the increase in complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4211017B1Power platform with four wheel steering/rear wheel steering
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 RAVEN INDUSTRIES INC
  • EP4211017B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4211017B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4211017B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A device for steering an agricultural machine having independently steerable axles includes first and second steerable axle interface to couple with a first steering mechanism of a first steerable axle and a second a second steering mechanism of a second steerable axle. The device includes a planning module having a guidance path for the agricultural machine, and a steering control module to coordinate steering of the steering mechanisms. The steering control module includes a translational comparator to determine a translational difference between a location of the agricultural machine relative to the guidance path, an angular comparator to determine an angular difference between an angular orientation of the agricultural machine relative to the guidance path, and a translation steering controller to actuate the first and second steering mechanisms according to the translational difference. The device includes an angular steering controller to actuate the second steering mechanism according to the angular difference.