Independent Blade Control for Precision In-Row Crop Weeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current crop maintenance devices face limitations such as fixed mechanical motion, positional errors along and perpendicular to the plant row, inability to adjust for different plant shapes, and large clearance requirements due to imprecision, leading to potential damage to plants and inefficient soil treatment.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent crop maintenance device with independently controlled blades, utilizing feedback control and sensors to dynamically adjust blade position and speed, allowing for precise contouring around plants of varying sizes and shapes, eliminating the need for system-level side-shift mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed mechanical motion systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to inability to adapt to plant variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical motion controlVSAvoidblade positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic blade control where each blade can independently adjust its position, speed, and contour in real-time based on sensor feedback about plant location and shape. This transforms the fixed mechanical motion into a dynamic, adaptive system that maintains high precision without requiring overly complex mechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors to detect plant positions and shapes, then feeds this information back to the control system which adjusts blade positions and motions accordingly. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise blade positioning while keeping the overall device complexity manageable through software-based adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If large clearance is maintained around plants, then plant damage is reduced, but productivity decreases due to inefficient soil treatment coverage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant damageVSAvoidsoil treatment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blades dynamically adjust their positions and contours in real-time to closely follow plant boundaries. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain minimal safe clearance while maximizing soil treatment coverage, eliminating the need for fixed large clearance zones and thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each blade independently adapts its position and contour to match the local plant geometry it encounters. This local quality adjustment enables precise navigation around individual plants of varying shapes and sizes, allowing close passage without damage while treating all surrounding soil effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If indiscriminate row-based cultivation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to accommodate varying plant positions and shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidblade-to-plant positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cultivation system is segmented into independently controlled blades rather than a single unified mechanism. Each blade can be controlled separately based on local plant conditions, enabling precise adaptation to varying plant positions and shapes without requiring the entire system to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (blade position, speed, contour) in real-time based on detected plant characteristics. This parameter adaptation allows the blades to precisely follow plant boundaries and accommodate variations in plant positioning and morphology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If mechanical systems with large clearance requirements are used, then reliability is improved by avoiding plant damage, but productivity decreases due to reduced working width

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant safetyVSAvoidfield coverage rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blades transition from fixed positions requiring large clearance to dynamically adjustable positions that adapt to each plant's location and shape. This dynamic capability maintains plant safety through real-time adjustment while maximizing field coverage and productivity by reducing unnecessary clearance zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11483958B2Intelligent crop maintenance device with independently controlled blades
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 VISION ROBOTICS CORP
  • US11483958B2 patent drawing
  • US11483958B2 patent drawing
  • US11483958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

System that automates crop maintenance activities, such as cultivating and weeding, with a device that intelligently and independently controls two blades that drag along either side of a crop row using sensors to repeatedly track the position of the blades and of the plants in the row. Blades may be moved in and out independently using an actuator for each blade to contour closely around the individual plants, even if plants or rows vary in their positions, and even if plant sizes and shapes differ. An illustrative system may use a single camera and a processor per crop row; the processor may analyze camera images to locate plant positions and shapes, to plan blade trajectories, and to control blade actuators. The processor may be able to control blade movement precisely to respond quickly to sensor input on changes in plant positions, shapes, and sizes along the row.