Independent Cart Motion Control With Distributed Segment Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized computer systems in independent cart technology (ICT) for motion control of movers are costly and have slow update rates, especially for small tracks, limiting their efficiency and scalability.

Innovation Solution

The system partitions servo control commands into motion control commands and force control commands, distributing their execution across multiple devices, eliminating the need for a centralized computer and allowing for distributed control over track segments, thereby reducing costs and enhancing scalability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized computer system is used for motion control of movers in independent cart technology, then motion control can be achieved, but the system becomes costly and has slow update rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion control capabilityVSAvoidsystem cost and update rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized motion control system into distributed segment controllers, where each track segment has its own controller that can independently execute motion control commands. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure and bottleneck in centralized systems, reducing cost and improving update rates while maintaining reliable motion control across the entire track system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the motion control functionality from the centralized computer system and embeds it directly into the segment controllers. By taking out the motion control capability from the central gateway computer and placing it at the distributed segment level, the system achieves faster local response times and reduced dependency on centralized processing, thereby improving update rates and reducing overall system cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Extent of automation

If a centralized computer distributes servo control state variables to all track segments, then coordinated motion control is achieved, but update rates between the central computer and individual track segments become slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinated motion controlVSAvoidupdate rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control architecture so that each track segment controller can independently process and execute motion control commands without waiting for centralized computer updates. This segmentation enables parallel processing across multiple segments, dramatically increasing the overall update rate while maintaining coordinated motion through inter-segment communication protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the motion control functionality directly into each segment controller, combining the previously separate functions of centralized command distribution and local execution into integrated distributed units. This merging eliminates communication bottlenecks and enables each segment to operate autonomously with real-time responsiveness, achieving both coordinated control and high update rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If motion control responsibility is concentrated on one device, then centralized control is simplified, but the system becomes costly and less scalable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol architecture simplicityVSAvoidscalability and cost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments motion control responsibility across multiple distributed devices (segment controllers) rather than concentrating it in one centralized computer. Each segment controller is a simplified unit that handles local motion control, and the collective group of segment controllers provides system-wide control. This segmentation makes the system more scalable and cost-effective while maintaining architectural simplicity through standardized interface protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs segment controllers as universal, multi-functional units that can handle various motion control tasks across different track configurations. Each segment controller is capable of independent operation and can be scaled to accommodate different system sizes (from small to large tracks with up to 128 movers), providing adaptability and versatility without requiring complex reconfiguration or additional centralized processing power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach makes independent cart systems more cost-effective for small tracks while supporting large tracks with up to 128 movers, providing sufficient computing power for motion control without increasing product costs.

Implementation Method 1

a first drive coupled to the first plurality of drive coils... selectively controls the first drive to energize the first plurality of drive coils for establishing a first electromagnetic field to interact with the drive magnet on the mover for moving the mover along the first track segment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field interaction: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11643120B2Independent cart system and method of operating the same
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US11643120B2 patent drawing
  • US11643120B2 patent drawing
  • US11643120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for motion control of movers in an independent cart system is disclosed. In one implementation, the independent cart system includes a plurality of track segments, each section having a respective controller. One of the controllers receives a motion command for a plurality of carts, respectively. The controller generates a force command for each of the plurality of carts and transmits the respective commands to the track segments commutating the plurality of carts.