Indexable Cutting Insert With Guide Groove For Deburring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deburring tools with single cutting edges and limited design constraints face challenges in achieving efficient deburring of bores due to wedging issues and require complex geometries for accurate sliding movements, which complicates the design and manufacturing process.

Innovation Solution

A spring-loaded indexable cutting insert with two opposing cutting portions, each having two cutting edges, is designed with a guide groove and a compression spring for sliding movement, allowing for a compact octagonal shape that decouples wedging constraints and simplifies the sliding mechanism by transferring the sliding movement from the main body to the guide groove over a guide member, enabling efficient deburring without high accuracy requirements for the tool body surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single cutting edge design is used, then the tool structure is simpler, but the deburring efficiency and versatility are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeburring efficiencyVSAvoidcutting insert geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting insert is divided into two identical opposing cutting portions, each with its own cutting edges. This segmentation allows both cutting portions to work simultaneously or alternatively, doubling the deburring capability without significantly increasing overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cutting insert is designed with two identical opposing cutting portions that can perform the same cutting function. This multi-functionality allows the single insert to handle various deburring scenarios, improving productivity while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex geometries are used for accurate sliding movements, then the sliding precision is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding movement accuracyVSAvoidtool body manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A guide member is introduced as an intermediary element between the cutting insert and tool body. The guide groove in the insert engages with the guide member, providing accurate sliding guidance without requiring complex precision surfaces in the tool body itself. This transfers the precision requirement to the replaceable insert rather than the tool body

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding guidance function is separated into distinct components: the guide groove in the cutting insert and the corresponding guide member in the tool body. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured separately with standard tolerances, reducing overall manufacturing complexity while maintaining sliding accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If the cutting insert is designed with wedging constraints, then the cutting stability is improved, but the sliding mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting stabilityVSAvoidsliding mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide member acts as an intermediary that simultaneously provides both guidance for sliding movement and constraint to prevent unwanted wedging. This single element performs dual functions, maintaining cutting stability without adding separate complexity to the sliding mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The guidance and constraint functions are merged into a single guide member-cutting insert interface. The guide groove and guide member arrangement simultaneously ensures accurate sliding movement and prevents wedging, simplifying the overall mechanism while maintaining stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for a compact, efficient deburring tool design with improved sliding movement and reduced risk of wedging, maintaining effective cutting performance and ease of manufacturing by utilizing a spring-loaded mechanism to maintain the cutting insert in an extended position and facilitating easy retraction for indexing.

Implementation Method 1

the cutting insert being slidable between a retracted position and an extended position by means of a spring which biases the cutting insert towards the extended position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS7261498B2Deburring tool and cutting insert therefor
Publication Date: 2007.08.28 ISCAR LTD
  • US7261498B2 patent drawing
  • US7261498B2 patent drawing
  • US7261498B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A deburring tool having an indexable cutting insert having four cutting edges. The cutting insert has a main body portion and a guide groove. The cutting insert is slidably retained in an insert pocket with the main body portion of the insert located in a generally rectangular slot of the insert pocket and with the guide groove located and engaging a guide member portion of the insert pocket. The cutting insert is moveable between a retracted position and an extended position by means of a spring which biases the cutting insert towards the extended position. The sliding movement of the cutting insert is performed by the sliding of the guide member within the guide groove.